Report for week ending May 23, 2015:
I also coordinated the 1.8.2 security release which went out this week.
Triaged
---
https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/24787 - Cannot assign a ForeignKey
field with blank=True and null=False in Model.clean() (accepted)
https://code.djangoproject.c
Hi all,
Thanks for the feedback. It's good to know I'm on the right track.
I've pushed another commit that addresses most of the concerns raised here.
I've updated the example gist as well.
I'm also curious to learn more about this "set of decorators" that can
> be applied to a view by the ur
On 05/23/2015 11:37 AM, Marc Tamlyn wrote:
> If the backend is inferred by a single value in the settings and not
> stored alongside the user ID, what would happen to existing users
> who are already logged in when a second backend is added to the
> settings and deployed? Django wou
>
> If the backend is inferred by a single value in the settings and not
> stored alongside the user ID, what would happen to existing users who are
> already logged in when a second backend is added to the settings and
> deployed? Django would no longer know which backend to use to fetch the
> aut
Hey all,
A note on Carl's first suggestion. I currently override the authenticate
function with my own that does something similar. Instead of passing in a
single backend I pass in an iterable (usually a set for O(1) checks) that
optionally overrides settings.AUTHENTICATION_BACKENDS.
I haven't
I agree, why not always pass the single auth backend into the login
function?
If the backend is inferred by a single value in the settings and not stored
alongside the user ID, what would happen to existing users who are already
logged in when a second backend is added to the settings and deplo
HI Andy,
Yes, this thread is actual for discussing this theme.
Current pull request is https://github.com/django/django/pull/4627
I hope I'll have enough time to work on it this weekend.
On Saturday, 23 May 2015 15:35:51 UTC+5, Andy Baker wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Is this thread still the most up to
Hi,
Is this thread still the most up to date place for discussing this? I'm
trying to work out what the current status is and whether it is likely to
land in 1.9.
For the benefit of anyone else coming to this late here's what I can track
down:
Last comment here prior to mine was jezdez on Apr