Odd. We should really save the "through" attribute on the m2m field itself.
Maybe in 1.9...
On Tuesday, December 23, 2014 8:33:58 AM UTC-6, Tom Christie wrote:
>
> Thanks Russ, appreciate your time.
>
> I've no great problem with keeping 'through' table API undocumented with
> 1.8, probably doe
Thanks Russ, appreciate your time.
I've no great problem with keeping 'through' table API undocumented with 1.8,
probably doesn't matter too much either way. Just flagging it up, but looks
like 'no change' there, which is okay.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Goo