Re: Storage engine aliases?

2014-10-01 Thread Jannis Leidel
On 01 Oct 2014, at 14:33, Collin Anderson wrote: > In hindsight I regret not having pushed harder for integration of staticfiles > into core instead, lots of confusion could have been prevented, IMO. > > Is it too late to move to core? Good question, if we’d left the public API in django.con

Re: Built-in support for Jinja2 in Django

2014-10-01 Thread Russell Keith-Magee
On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 3:04 AM, Aymeric Augustin < aymeric.augus...@polytechnique.org> wrote: > Hello, > > I've been thinking about providing built-in support for Jinja2 in Django. > I found that supporting pluggable template engines, like Django does for > databases, caches, etc. would be the mos

Built-in support for Jinja2 in Django

2014-10-01 Thread Aymeric Augustin
Hello, I've been thinking about providing built-in support for Jinja2 in Django. I found that supporting pluggable template engines, like Django does for databases, caches, etc. would be the most elegant solution. The best summary I have at this time is on the crowdfunding campaign's page: htt

Re: Storage engine aliases?

2014-10-01 Thread Collin Anderson
> > In hindsight I regret not having pushed harder for integration of > staticfiles into core instead, lots of confusion could have been prevented, > IMO. > Is it too late to move to core? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers (Cont

Re: Transaction management and atomic

2014-10-01 Thread Aymeric Augustin
2014-10-01 9:21 GMT+02:00 Florian Apolloner : > Imo, this is mainly useful to rollback if no error occurred! The other use > of this feature might work but is quite dangerous imo. > If you really know what you are doing, it might be possible to use it safely while taking advantage of a database's

Re: Transaction management and atomic

2014-10-01 Thread Florian Apolloner
On Wednesday, October 1, 2014 6:58:28 AM UTC+2, Anssi Kääriäinen wrote: > > Django does allow to continue the transaction if you explicitly choose > to do so. After handling the error, you must use set_rollback[1]. This > is useful for those rare cases where you want to continue after error in >

Re: Transaction management and atomic

2014-10-01 Thread Florian Apolloner
On Wednesday, October 1, 2014 6:58:28 AM UTC+2, Anssi Kääriäinen wrote: > > Django does allow to continue the transaction if you explicitly choose > to do so. After handling the error, you must use set_rollback[1]. This > is useful for those rare cases where you want to continue after error in >

Re: Storage engine aliases?

2014-10-01 Thread Jannis Leidel
On 29 Sep 2014, at 22:46, Jeremy Dunck wrote: > Right now, I think that static/media handling is fairly confused in the > documentation, and a bit confused in the code itself. Please make sure to open tickets about this, I've long lost the ability to see at this code from the beginners perspe