Preparing a sample project to each module of the DjangoBook is what is
coding,and adding to that documentation using ReST (reStructuredText) , and
the Sphinx cant that be a GSOC Project .It has code in it ,by all means
Regards,
Devashish Badlani
--
You received this message because you are sub
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 9:28 AM, Tim Graham wrote:
> As someone who has worked on Django's docs a lot, I've considered pitching
> in to help update the Django Book. However, I'm not sure it's really the
> best use of time as there's a lot of overlap between Django's docs and the
> book. Unless so
FWIW these benchmaks are not measuring accurately. Creating a tuple of the
form "(1, 2, 3)" (notably, where all the members are literal constants)
takes NO time actually, since it's an immutable container of all immutable
items, the compiler is able to factor the work out. A benchmark, even as
idio
Hi Stratos,
Thanks for providing those benchmarks -- that's really helpful.
However, It's all well and good to say that "Doing X takes 0.01s" or "X is
50% slower than Y", but that if the time taken to do X is incredibly small
to start with, a 50% slowdown doesnt really matter that much. The fact
As someone who has worked on Django's docs a lot, I've considered pitching
in to help update the Django Book. However, I'm not sure it's really the
best use of time as there's a lot of overlap between Django's docs and the
book. Unless someone wants to argue otherwise, I suggest we adapt any
po
I think the most commonly requested feature is how to serilise non-Field
properties of models.
It's easy, but tedious, to do.
Perhaps you could write a mixin to help with this, and improve the
documentation?
However, I don't see this being a task taking more than a few days...
--
Curtis
On 2
Would increasing the scope of the django tutorial itself and deprecating
the djangobook solve the issue of new users learning django?
- The tutorial does a really great job of introducing the basics.
- Online resources for learning django have improved, significantly, since
0.96. Although it ca
For what it's worth, source graph is unable to find any callers of
clean_html in OSS code (maybe github only?) either:
https://sourcegraph.com/github.com/django/django/symbols/python/django/utils/html/clean_html
Alex
On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 2:15 PM, Erik Romijn wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I would l
Dear all,
I would like to propose the accelerated deprecation of the
fix_ampersands built-in template filter, because in all use cases, it
either simply does not work, or stimulates the user to create security
vulnerabilities.
In addition, I would like to deprecate django.utils.html.clean_html. T
On Thursday, 20 February 2014 00:35:43 UTC+5:30, Andrew Pashkin wrote:
>
> BTW - I recent;y trid to run Django test suite with Py.test and
> pytest-django plugin and achived some success - main problem, that some
> tests are failing and reason of it is not clear to me yet.
> This solution requi
On Thursday, 20 February 2014 00:35:43 UTC+5:30, Andrew Pashkin wrote:
>
> BTW - I recent;y trid to run Django test suite with Py.test and
> pytest-django plugin and achived some success - main problem, that some
> tests are failing and reason of it is not clear to me yet.
> This solution requi
Hello Guys!
I am planning to work on developing and improving the security features of
Django.
I would like some help in formalizing the proposal so that it will meet the
requirements.
Things i understood how security against csrf works and how it is
implemented in django. (please correct
Hey all,
Here is the idea (Improving *django.core.serializers* module).
I have used django serializer module recently and feel its really not that
beautiful.
1. Good moderation mechanism in choosing attributes to serialize;
2. To sort the order of serialized data
[I am still thinking about wha
I originally wanted to work on aggregates/annotation improvement in GSoC
and still wish the same. The issues that I want to consider are:
Implementing arithmetic operations on aggregation/annotation.
Implementing conditional aggregates.
Fixing the errors related to the working eg. default values
Oh! And as far as I understand they're equally memory consuming
import sys
from collections import namedtuple
T = namedtuple('T', 'a b c d e')
assert sys.getsizeof((1,2,3,4,5)) == sys.getsizeof(T(1,2,3,4,5))
W dniu niedziela, 23 lutego 2014 14:12:38 UTC+1 użytkownik Adam Kaliński
napisał:
>
>
I did my own tests with similar results:
http://nbviewer.ipython.org/gist/adamkal/9171081
looks like creating a namedtuple is also quite time consuming and it's even
hard to compare to tuple here.
Good thing is that we have backward compatibility that has no overhead on
accessing data.
W dn
16 matches
Mail list logo
