On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 1:06 AM, Burak Emre Kabakcı
wrote:
> I have two applications: One of them uses default auth.User model and the
> other one uses another AbstractUser class configured as AUTH_USER_MODEL.
> These two apps uses same codebase except their settings.py file. One of the
> models h
Hi Cliff,
just as a side note, the fact that you get those error in your inbox is
also a sign of a missconfiguration of your webserver. The Django error is
so to say a last resort, on a properly configured system those requests
would never reach Django at all.
Regards,
Florian
On Thursday, Fe
Thanks for the quick response, Mark. That's awesome. Sorry I missed it in
the changelog.
Cheers,
Cliff
On Thursday, February 13, 2014 12:35:16 PM UTC-5, Mark Lavin wrote:
>
> This was already changed in https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/19866which
> is part of 1.6. It's noted under the min
This was already changed in https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/19866
which is part of 1.6. It's noted under the minor
features https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/1.6/releases/1.6/#minor-features
SuspiciousOperation has been differentiated into a number of subclasses,
and each will log to a ma
Django devs,
I've noticed that the new ALLOWED_HOSTS causes the site
to return HTTP-500 errors whenever a user submits a request with an
HTTP_HOST header that is not allowed. This is flooding my developers'
inboxes with spurious error messages. The site is refusing the
requests as expected, but
I have two applications: One of them uses default auth.User model and the
other one uses another AbstractUser class configured as AUTH_USER_MODEL.
These two apps uses same codebase except their settings.py file. One of the
models has a ForeignKey field in relation with auth.User model (I use
au
El miércoles, 12 de febrero de 2014 15:11:33 UTC-3, Florian Apolloner
escribió:
>
> Nice, can you also upload wheel packages?
>
Done!
For now, just for the stable version (django-firebird with django 1.5
support)
>
> On Wednesday, February 12, 2014 2:19:11 PM UTC+1, mariuz wrote:
>>
>> Here