Hi,
(quotations reordered a little)
On Wednesday 22 January 2014 14:48:25 Russell Keith-Magee wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 1:51 PM, Michael Manfre wrote:
> > *Why Disable Migrations?*
> >
> > 1) Not all projects need schema migrations or want Django to manage the
> > migrations. My primary
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 1:51 PM, Michael Manfre wrote:
> *Must a Django Database Support Migrations?*
>
> Django 1.7 adds schema migration support and this behavior is currently
> required
> to be able to effectively use Django and run the test suite. I opened
> ticket
> #21841 [1], which request
*Must a Django Database Support Migrations?*
Django 1.7 adds schema migration support and this behavior is currently
required
to be able to effectively use Django and run the test suite. I opened ticket
#21841 [1], which requests adding a DatabaseFeature to disable schema
migrations. This ticket p
please see that it is python directive not django. for all sources it is a
good practive for all we that use pt-br utf-8 explicit this on second line
of file python code
# -*- coding: utf-8 -*-
regards!
2014/1/21 Henrique Romano
> Hi,
>
> As per the documentation[1], it is not clear that yo
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 2:03 AM, Carl Meyer wrote:
> On 01/21/2014 06:48 AM, Russell Keith-Magee wrote:
> > As Marc indicated in his post, I don't think we should be treating this
> > as a permanent feature of the API, but as but as a migration aid. Yes,
> > default_app_config will exist as a bad
Hi,
As per the documentation[1], it is not clear that you _must_ use a unicode
string for the language name. If you don't use an unicode string, the
following can happen:
>>> from django.utils.translation import ugettext
>>> ugettext("Português")
Traceback (most recent call last):
...
UnicodeDec
On Tuesday 21 January 2014 20:03:25 Carl Meyer wrote:
> On 01/21/2014 06:48 AM, Russell Keith-Magee wrote:
> > As Marc indicated in his post, I don't think we should be treating this
> > as a permanent feature of the API, but as but as a migration aid. Yes,
> > default_app_config will exist as a ba
I agree with Aymeric in that cursors are very much like files. Wrapping a
single line of code in a with (or a try-finally) is a standard pattern and
allows Django to follow PEP 249 without extra modifications.
The overall feedback I've gotten from my pull request seems positive. I'll
rebase it aga
On 01/21/2014 06:48 AM, Russell Keith-Magee wrote:
> As Marc indicated in his post, I don't think we should be treating this
> as a permanent feature of the API, but as but as a migration aid. Yes,
> default_app_config will exist as a bad smell for 2 releases, but come
> Django 1.9, we can remove i
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 11:09 PM, Jannis Leidel wrote:
> On 19.01.2014, at 08:56, Russell Keith-Magee
> wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > First off - this isn't critical for 1.7 alpha - I'm raising it now
> because I've been in this space for the last couple of days as a result of
> the working on th
10 matches
Mail list logo