On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 12:36 AM, Kamil Gałuszka wrote:
> Hi !
>
> I wanted to post this in old topic from 2010 but Google always gives me an
> error on posting so I can't do that there. (soory for that!)
>
> I know that mod_python support was dropped long time ago but I think this
> information s
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 5:09 PM, Ramiro Morales wrote:
> Now that specs like WSGI exist there is no point in going back one decade
> implementing interfaces to cater for one particular web server integration
> implementation.
Is that any worse than where we are now, using an interface that only
a
If it implements WSGI then there is no need to add or modify anything from
the Django side. Both should be able to talk to each other using that
protocol.
Now that specs like WSGI exist there is no point in going back one decade
implementing interfaces to cater for one particular web server integr
I understand that and I agree that it maybe doesn't have any uptake. But,
my reason for sending that information was question from today on
django-users about mod_python support on Django.
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/django-users/449r3gUsN54
Cheers,
Kamil Gałuszka
2013/11/25 Alex Gay
I'm -1 on this. If it's, in fact, just a normal WSGI container, we should
add docs for it if it has any uptake, as we would for any other WSGI
container, and I don't believe it has any uptake.
Alex
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 10:36 AM, Kamil Gałuszka wrote:
> Hi !
>
> I wanted to post this in old t
Hi !
I wanted to post this in old topic from 2010 but Google always gives me an
error on posting so I can't do that there. (soory for that!)
I know that mod_python support was dropped long time ago but I think this
information should be noted to core developers. There is new release of
mod_pyt
On Friday 22 November 2013 07:31:38 Adam Smith wrote:
> As I was learning the Django Docs (
> https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/1.6/topics/db/models/#extra-fields-on-man
> y-to-many-relationships), I found the following code not working. Is it a
> bug? At least the result is unexpected.
>
> ringo
Waylan is correct, but does not go far enough.
When one installs Python 3.3, the Python Launcher for Windows is also
installed. I install Python 3 even on systems where I do not (at present)
plan to use it, just to get the launcher. The launcher is the program which
should be associated with .p
