Re: Django 1.6 release timeline

2013-10-05 Thread Aymeric Augustin
Several release blockers were discovered over the last two weeks. Most were fixed, two are still open: https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/21197 https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/21164 At this point the ETA for 1.6 RC1 is really "once these tickets are fixed". Thanks for your understanding

Re: Django session not saved

2013-10-05 Thread Karen Tracey
Please ask questions about using Django on django-users. The topic of this list is the development of Django itself. Thanks, Karen -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from

Django session not saved

2013-10-05 Thread Malhar Vora
Hello I have simple application which checks for username and password in database as well as looks in session for key "user_id". If user exists and login gets successfull then page is redirected to admin page. Here problem is I am storing username in session in one view and retrieving it anoth

Re: Working towards a simpler GCBV implementation?

2013-10-05 Thread James Pic
I should state that I have no education and that I have the feeling that I understand GCBVs perfectly. But django-vanilla-views are not as usable because you cannot reuse isolated pieces of functionality like you can with mixins. Maybe this is a documentation problem ? Maybe the docs should expl

Re: Working towards a simpler GCBV implementation?

2013-10-05 Thread Albert O'Connor
+1 to anything which makes CBV easier to use and simpler to understand. >From looking at what have done you have been able to address my biggest concern, the depth of the hierarchy. I find using flat "CBV" like the syndication framework a lot easier then the current GCBV implementation. Thanks, A

Re: Working towards a simpler GCBV implementation?

2013-10-05 Thread Tino de Bruijn
On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 11:09 AM, Tom Christie wrote: > * If a simpler GCBV implementation along the lines of django-vanilla-views > is something we think we should working towards. > Hells yes, +1. I love CBV, but when it gets a little more complex, I get dazzled. > * What approaches we might b

Re: Oracle broken on 1.6

2013-10-05 Thread Shai Berger
Hi, On Friday 04 October 2013 19:39:51 Ramiro Morales wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 12:43 PM, Shai Berger wrote: > > Hi, > > > > It looks like the fix to #21165[1] broke the tests on Oracle (seems like > > the behavior with respect to timezone information changed) in 1.6.X. I > > just saw t