I've written four more tests. I've moved some of checks out of `__init__`
methods. I've changed `tag` to `register`. I've rebased against master. I've
improved documentation (added sections about filtering and silencing system
checks), but I'm still polishing it. Code is ready for final review exce
2013/9/11
> Do you have an update on the schedule for the the Final? I guess it would
> be any week now, but I have some internal factors that require me to ask
> for your updated forecast.
>
Hi Tony,
Since we released 1.6 beta 3 yesterday, the next step is to release 1.6 RC
1. We haven't chose
Tim,
Do you have an update on the schedule for the the Final? I guess it would
be any week now, but I have some internal factors that require me to ask
for your updated forecast.
Thanks,
Tony
On Friday, August 16, 2013 7:14:48 AM UTC-7, Tim Graham wrote:
>
> Obviously, we've missed our target
On 2013-09-10 21:05, Russell Keith-Magee wrote:
> So - I think custom Meta options are something that should be
> *possible*. I don't have any particular ideas for how it should be
> implemented, though.
One of the areas I've considered trying this is annotating "private"
information about models.
On Friday, September 6, 2013 10:11:18 PM UTC+2, German Larrain wrote:
>
> Hi Stan.
>
> I'm currently looking for "admin-related" features that seemed to be kind
> of accepted by the core developers.
>
> What's the status of your proposal for grouping actions?
>
Hi Germán,
The status is "I shou
