Re: Making ".only()" a bit smarter

2013-07-19 Thread Michal Petrucha
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 01:02:34PM +0100, Pablo Recio wrote: > Hi devs, > > I just came up with the following scenario: > > class A(models.Model): > # some fields... > b = models.ForeignKey(B) > > class B(models.Model): > # other fields > > A simple FK relationship. Well, then I wan

Re: Deprecate FCGI support in Django 1.7

2013-07-19 Thread Juan Luis Boya
> > For those who are keen to keep support for FastCGI, would you be > interested in helping me develop/maintain a Pure Python > FastCGI->WSGI(Django-specific) publisher package? > That exists and it's called flup. The code base is relatively small. What about simply forking it to something li

Re: Deprecate FCGI support in Django 1.7

2013-07-19 Thread Juan Luis Boya
On Friday, July 19, 2013 12:53:48 AM UTC+2, Javier Guerra wrote: > i think several people like to use gunicorn for http-wsgi, if it (or > something similar: flask? wep.py?, werkzeug?) supports fcgi, it could > be the recommended fcgi solution. > flask, webpy, werkzeug: all of those use flup. g

Making ".only()" a bit smarter

2013-07-19 Thread Pablo Recio
Hi devs, I just came up with the following scenario: class A(models.Model): # some fields... b = models.ForeignKey(B) class B(models.Model): # other fields A simple FK relationship. Well, then I wanted to fetch objects from 'A' model but just for retrieve the related 'B', so I tried