Re: Faster numbers for Oracle

2013-06-17 Thread Shai Berger
So,... On Monday 17 June 2013 16:02:05 Shai Berger wrote: > On Thursday 16 May 2013 03:51:05 Shai Berger wrote: > > Ticket #20414[0] and PR #1071[1]. > > Over a month, and no comment from anyone on these; I take it as sign that > nobody has time for it. Unless someone wakes up quite quickly to op

Re: Question about password salt and encryption

2013-06-17 Thread Jon Dufresne
On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 2:24 PM, Luke Plant wrote: > 2) Should Django's security be improved by an additional salt that isn't > stored in the database? > > Regarding number 2, this is not likely to happen quickly, due to > backwards compatibility issues, and the need to introduce a new setting >

Faster numbers for Oracle

2013-06-17 Thread Shai Berger
On Thursday 16 May 2013 03:51:05 Shai Berger wrote: > > Ticket #20414[0] and PR #1071[1]. Over a month, and no comment from anyone on these; I take it as sign that nobody has time for it. Unless someone wakes up quite quickly to oppose, I'm going to commit essentially the PR (I'm editing it fo