Re: unittest.TestCase vs. django.test.TestCase in overview example

2013-03-31 Thread Lorin Hochstein
I created a Django Trac ticket for this: https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/20165 On Saturday, March 30, 2013 11:30:44 PM UTC-4, Brian Schott wrote: > > There is really a bigger question in my mind about the appropriateness of > using django.utils.unittest in the testing overview section. I

Re: javascript view for named urls

2013-03-31 Thread Jonathan Slenders
As Andrew says, some "rely" on the obscurity of this server side information. The same can be said of translations. I'd like to see better support for javascript preprocessing. gettext(...) in javascript could be preprocessed if the language is known. url_resolve('name', { ...}) could probably a

Re: Kickstarter for Django Admin?

2013-03-31 Thread Serge G. Spaolonzi
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 7:20 PM, Victor Hooi wrote: > > From the existing projects, we can draw two clear requirements that people > want: > >- Changing the look and feel - I'm not sure what Django core's >feelings on it, but there seems to be a feeling from the community that the >lo

unittest2 discovery proposal

2013-03-31 Thread Preston Timmons
Hi all, There are some important design decisions to be made if we include unittest2 discovery into Django. This message documents a proposed API, the pros and cons, and decisions that need to be made. https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/17365 -- Limitation of current test setup: -- * Tests

Re: Testing project code that resides outside of installed apps

2013-03-31 Thread Yo-Yo Ma
That's excellent news! Thanks, Carl. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to django-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group,

Re: Kickstarter for Django Admin?

2013-03-31 Thread Russell Keith-Magee
On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 6:20 AM, Victor Hooi wrote: > heya, > > Aha, yes - we need a roadmap, and somebody from the team to execute it > *grins*. > No - We need someone from the core team to *commit* it. We don't need someone from the core team to *build* it. It's also worth pointing out that t