Hi,
On Monday, August 13, 2012 1:54:36 AM UTC+2, Alex_Gaynor wrote:
>
> In my view, the current largest source of boilerplate with management
> commands is where they have to be, you have to stick them 3 directories
> deep. Writing a command itself is pretty boilerplate free.
>
Agreed, a saner
On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 4:51 PM, Russell Keith-Magee <
russ...@keith-magee.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 6:32 PM, Florian Apolloner
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> >
> > On Sunday, August 12, 2012 2:22:58 AM UTC+2, Russell Keith-Magee wrote:
> >>
> >> I'll agree that it looks appealing. However, a
On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 6:32 PM, Florian Apolloner
wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> On Sunday, August 12, 2012 2:22:58 AM UTC+2, Russell Keith-Magee wrote:
>>
>> I'll agree that it looks appealing. However, as always, my question is
>> about backwards compatibility.
>
>
> Seriously? In my eyes it's ugly, especi
Some people prefer argparse, some people prefer decorator-based syntax
(like django-boss or argh), there are people prefer other methods (e.g.
docopt). I think it is better not to invent yet another command-line
framework.
Maybe delegate option parsing to user favorive library and provide some
Hi Russ,
Sorry for the delayed response. Just finished up chairing PyOhio and got
through my work backlog.
Broadly speaking -- yes, sounds interesting; the trick will be coming
> up with an API that *isn't* PostgreSQL specific.
>
Definitely, and one that doesn't complicate things for the 99%
On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 4:41 PM, Cal Leeming [Simplicity Media Ltd] <
cal.leem...@simplicitymedialtd.co.uk> wrote:
> Based on all the responses given so far, here are the options available.
>
> Further feedback would be much appreciated.
>
> *A) Use READ COMMITTED as a global/my.cnf:*
>
> Last tim
Based on all the responses given so far, here are the options available.
Further feedback would be much appreciated.
*A) Use READ COMMITTED as a global/my.cnf:*
Last time we tried read committed isolation levels, it caused various PHP
applications to break for an unknown reason - as it was in a
Hi,
On Sunday, August 12, 2012 2:22:58 AM UTC+2, Russell Keith-Magee wrote:
>
> I'll agree that it looks appealing. However, as always, my question is
> about backwards compatibility.
>
Seriously? In my eyes it's ugly, especially if you have more than one
options. Eg imagine you have decorated
