Re: startproject template context

2012-06-10 Thread Sam Simmons
Using a custom command with defined options will work quite nicely and be much clearer. Thanks for the suggestion! At the very least, the existing --template option shows an interesting example of using the template engine to render arbitrary files. On Friday, June 8, 2012 4:37:38 AM UTC-5, Jan

Re: Proposed Field API additions

2012-06-10 Thread Anssi Kääriäinen
On 9 kesä, 13:37, Andrew Godwin wrote: > Eugh, autogenerated python files full of imports? Plus, you'd > potentially need more than one (for different migration versions), and I > don't see what improvement this is over full paths, which is what Luke > proposed, what South currently does, and it w

Re: Draft branch: Swappable User models in contrib.auth

2012-06-10 Thread Anssi Kääriäinen
On 10 kesä, 10:42, Russell Keith-Magee wrote: > I'm not sure I see why. This looks to me like *exactly* what apps are > designed to achieve. By way of implementation, it might make sense to > introduce this as a 'sub app' - i.e., contrib.auth.improveduser would > be an installable app in itself; t

Re: Draft branch: Swappable User models in contrib.auth

2012-06-10 Thread Russell Keith-Magee
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 7:50 PM, Anssi Kääriäinen wrote: > On 8 kesä, 13:43, Russell Keith-Magee wrote: >> That's certainly an interesting use case. However, I can think of at >> least 2 ways it could be mitigated. >> >> One way would be to treat this as part of the contract of a pluggble >> app.