On 01-06-12 16:54, Jacob Kaplan-Moss wrote:
I think as a whole we're divided. Luke's opinions differ from
mine, and it's entirely unclear to me who's "right" or even if there's
a "right" to be had. And that's just the two of us!
I think this might be a situation where we need some more feed
On Jun 2, 3:57 am, Russell Keith-Magee
wrote:
>
> For auditing purposes, a ticket is always helpful, even if the ticket
> is closed straight away. That way, anyone who hits the same problem
> later on can see the source of the problem and the fact that a
> solution should be coming in the near fu
On Jun 2, 7:57 am, Russell Keith-Magee
wrote:
> Apologies for the long and rambling answer; I hope it's shed some
> light on the source of my concern. To be clear -- I'm not completely
> opposed to your idea of 'stickiness', and I can see how it might be
> useful -- I've just got concerns about th
On Jun 2, 6:53 am, Russell Keith-Magee
wrote:
> I might be missing something in the details here, but are you
> proposing here that even though there's only one FK reverse relation
> from Event to Person, there would be 2 attributes (events and
> confirmed_events) containing lists? That doesn't st
