On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 6:10 PM, sebastien piquemal wrote:
>> So - it's one of those things that *should* be documented and
>> fomalized; it's just waiting on someone with the spare time to do the
>> job.
>
> Sounds good ! Any estimation on how big is the cleaning task ? I know
> documentation tas
On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 8:12 AM, Paul McMillan wrote:
> If you write a good and comprehensive set of instructions for making
> django work with gunicorn, and are willing to keep them up to date, I
> see no reason we shouldn't include them. It's what I use, and has the
> advantage of being very, ve
If you write a good and comprehensive set of instructions for making
django work with gunicorn, and are willing to keep them up to date, I
see no reason we shouldn't include them. It's what I use, and has the
advantage of being very, very easy to get working.
-Paul
--
You received this message b
About a year ago Luke Plant wontfixed ticket #14597, which requested
that Django add support setting for request.is_secure based on
proxy-added headers (like X-Forwarded-Protocol) when Django is served
by an HTTPS proxy [1].
Luke's reasons for closing were analogous to the
SetRemoteAddrFromForward
Hello,
After watching glyphs talk [1], do we want to add a gunicorn
installation instruction to the installation docs? What is your
opinion?
Wim
[1]: http://blip.tv/djangocon/keynote-glyph-lefkowitz-5573264
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django d
2011/9/23 tWoolie :
> I've submitted a pull request (https://github.com/django/django/pull/
> 51) for an active() relatedmanager method on the models class. I
> wanted to get some feedback from other devs about inclusion into
> trunk. I've included a patch to the docs if you want more info.
Hello
I've submitted a pull request (https://github.com/django/django/pull/
51) for an active() relatedmanager method on the models class. I
wanted to get some feedback from other devs about inclusion into
trunk. I've included a patch to the docs if you want more info.
--
You received this message beca
> So - it's one of those things that *should* be documented and
> fomalized; it's just waiting on someone with the spare time to do the
> job.
Sounds good ! Any estimation on how big is the cleaning task ? I know
documentation task can go forever :)
And what about the extra features I suggested ?
On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 4:46 PM, sebastien piquemal wrote:
> Hi all !
>
> So this might be a stupid idea, or it might have been answered
> before ... actually it seems so obvious to me that you have probably
> thought of it before and rejected it !!! But let's try ...
>
> I was wondering, why isn'
Hi all !
So this might be a stupid idea, or it might have been answered
before ... actually it seems so obvious to me that you have probably
thought of it before and rejected it !!! But let's try ...
I was wondering, why isn't there a user API for introspecting models ?
OK, there is an API, thro
10 matches
Mail list logo