Re: Weekly check-in (this should be #5, right...?)

On Jul 6, 1:39 am, akaariai wrote: > Having said all this, for this project "extend the connection tuple" > approach seems to be the only sane choice. I implemented this in my github branch https://github.com/akaariai/django/tree/composite_join With this you can do: a = Article.objects.all() a.

Re: Weekly check-in (this should be #5, right...?)

On Jun 27, 4:22 am, Michal Petrucha wrote: > some visible progress on my project at long last. I spent most of the > last week digging deep inside the ORM's entrails to make composite > field lookups possible and finally it looks promising. > > While working on this I found out the extra_filters a

Re: [GSoC form-rendering] Weekly Check-in

Hi, Chris. Seems that I'm now unemployed as GSoC Student, looks like you already did all the work! ;-) Besides this, great work. If I understand the source code right (haven't run it yet), then it's already feature complete, isn't it? I also like the idea of "extends", I will definitely bring th

Re: django tests fails!

On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 9:01 PM, Mateusz Harasymczuk wrote: > #urls.py >     url(r'^', include('rm.urls', namespace="rm"), name="rm"), > #rm/urls.py >     url(r'progress/$', ProgressView.as_view(), name='progress'), Ok -- seriously -- I have no interest in playing hunt the bug. If you want to rep

Re: django tests fails!

#urls.py url(r'^', include('rm.urls', namespace="rm"), name="rm"), #rm/urls.py url(r'progress/$', ProgressView.as_view(), name='progress'), -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To view this discussion on the web visit

Re: django tests fails!

> python manage.py test Creating test database for alias 'default'... E...

Re: django tests fails!

On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 8:38 PM, Mateusz Harasymczuk wrote: > I am sorry, my bad. > I was not sure that this one is a bug too, therefore I have asked at > django-users: > https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/django-users/S_4IuKw_e2U > > however I think it is, and it should be reported to trac. >

Re: Raising the minimum PostgreSQL version to 8.3

On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 7:33 PM, Anand Kumria wrote: > Hi, > > In ticket #16255 , > changeset https://code.djangoproject.com/changeset/16423 raises the > minimum supported PostgreSQL version to 8.2 > > However the PostgreSQL support policy,

Re: django tests fails!

I am sorry, my bad. I was not sure that this one is a bug too, therefore I have asked at django-users: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/django-users/S_4IuKw_e2U however I think it is, and it should be reported to trac. What do you think? -- You received this message because you are sub

Re: django tests fails!

On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 6:52 PM, Mateusz Harasymczuk wrote: > I have found two bugs in tests django.contrib.auth > https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/16412 > https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/16413 Hi Mateusz, Thanks for opening those tickets, but as it says in the contributions guide, the

Re: ImportError: No module named sh_csv_importer

Please ask questions about using Django on django-users. The topic of this list is the development of Django itself. Karen -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.

ImportError: No module named sh_csv_importer

I am trying to run a project in Django that was coded 3-4 years before. I have installed most of the modules required by the project but could not locate one of the module required to run the project. I am getting ImportError: No module named sh_csv_importer I have tried to search it , installed

django tests fails!

I have found two bugs in tests django.contrib.auth https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/16412 https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/16413 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://gr

Re: Reversing translated urls in templates

Jannis Leidel wrote: > > On 05.07.2011, at 09:26, Jonathan Slenders wrote: > >> I'm also +1 on {% language lang_code %}... {% endlanguage %} >> >> We are using exactly this template tag for maybe about half a year >> already. Not for i18n urls, but for formatting numbers. The decimal >> separat

Re: Django Design Czar

Hey Victor, So far, only small steps -- my time hasn't provided for any thing "major" yet. :) My twitter will be a good place, as will this list. Right now, my head is mainly in helping out with a couple of specific issues (formrendering, admin sorting). There are some plans underway to provid

Re: Reversing translated urls in templates

On 05.07.2011, at 09:26, Jonathan Slenders wrote: > I'm also +1 on {% language lang_code %}... {% endlanguage %} > > We are using exactly this template tag for maybe about half a year > already. Not for i18n urls, but for formatting numbers. The decimal > separator in Dutch is a comma, but somet

[GSoC composite fields] Weekly check-in #6

Hi folks, Sorry about this delayed post. My repo now supports using CompositeField as a model's primary key, as far as models are concerned, that means, Model.pk and friends. For the next week, expect admin to work. THe work is underway, nothing worthy of publishing just yet. Michal [1] https:/

Re: Reversing translated urls in templates

I'm also +1 on {% language lang_code %}... {% endlanguage %} We are using exactly this template tag for maybe about half a year already. Not for i18n urls, but for formatting numbers. The decimal separator in Dutch is a comma, but sometimes we want to be sure to have a dot a some part of the templ