Re: Using asserts in test code

2010-12-26 Thread Alex Gaynor
On Sun, Dec 26, 2010 at 9:55 PM, Will Hardy wrote: > It's true that there isn't any rich API for the Error/Fail distinction. The > best I can think of would be to create a custom exception eg > FailedAssumption, which is raised when the TestCase.failedException (same as > AssertionError) is caugh

Re: Using asserts in test code

2010-12-26 Thread Will Hardy
It's true that there isn't any rich API for the Error/Fail distinction. The best I can think of would be to create a custom exception eg FailedAssumption, which is raised when the TestCase.failedException (same as AssertionError) is caught while testing an assumption. Here are four ways I can thin

Re: contrib 's FormWizard needs a lot of work

2010-12-26 Thread Miguel Araujo
I'm sorry, I misspelled Jannis' name by mistake. 2010/12/26 Miguel Araujo > Hi Stephan, > > I'm sorry but I didn't get any answer on Github :) > > In that case, if you already discussed it with Jannie Leidel and Russell > Keith-Magee, then I guess they liked the idea of replacing it with you app

Re: contrib 's FormWizard needs a lot of work

2010-12-26 Thread Miguel Araujo
Hi Stephan, I'm sorry but I didn't get any answer on Github :) In that case, if you already discussed it with Jannie Leidel and Russell Keith-Magee, then I guess they liked the idea of replacing it with you app when it has some more work done. In that case if you are planning on working on it, I

Re: contrib 's FormWizard needs a lot of work

2010-12-26 Thread Stephan Jäkel
Hi Miguel, I saw your message on GitHub and I thought I had answered that I'll work on the formwizard within the next weeks. But maybe I missed to press the "send" button :-) Regarding your points, I had the same thoughts in 02/2010 and started to write django-formwizard. There were also som

contrib 's FormWizard needs a lot of work

2010-12-26 Thread Miguel Araujo
Hi everyone, I think FormWizard solves a common problem when you need forms to be split into steps, many frameworks have solutions to this pattern. I started using it and soon realized there is much left to be done and it looks like it's been postponed too long. In brief it's missing support for: