2010/12/3 Łukasz Rekucki :
> On 30 November 2010 16:38, Jacob Kaplan-Moss wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 9:47 AM, Russell Keith-Magee
>> wrote:
>>> However, given the Unless Jannis is willing to downgrade his -1 to a
>>> -0, I think a BDFL judgement is called for here.
>>
>> Let's go with {% w
On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 3:47 AM, KentH wrote:
> I completed the upload of patch, tests & docs a few weeks ago. As I
> think it's complete, I was hoping review might make the sprint this
> weekend. It's still assigned to "Pandres", but I think that was just
> from when it was initially closed "Wontf
Hi all,
Subtly drawing attention to
http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/14807
A minor fix including test.
Klaas
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-develop...@googlegroups.com.
To
On 30 November 2010 16:38, Jacob Kaplan-Moss wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 9:47 AM, Russell Keith-Magee
> wrote:
>> However, given the Unless Jannis is willing to downgrade his -1 to a
>> -0, I think a BDFL judgement is called for here.
>
> Let's go with {% with a=foo b=bar %}.
Does this mean
I completed the upload of patch, tests & docs a few weeks ago. As I
think it's complete, I was hoping review might make the sprint this
weekend. It's still assigned to "Pandres", but I think that was just
from when it was initially closed "Wontfix".
Pls let me know if there's something else I shou
I am trying to store a python object in the session data, which holds
lots of parameter values from various previously visited forms. All
of the submit actions push to the same view function.
After seeing that data appear to be randomly wrong, I am managing the
saving of this data myself with cP
On 12/02/2010 04:27 PM, Dan Fairs wrote:
I was wondering whether the bug still exists in Python 2.x because I take it
only AttributeError and TypeError should be ignored while calling __len__ in
list() -- if that's the case, the bug is definitely still present.
True - I'll give it a try in 2.
On 12/01/2010 08:04 AM, Waldemar Kornewald wrote:
In the end JOINs will be a rather complicated solution. I thought
that's why you wanted to extend the ORM directly to handle embedded
fields in a special way. That should be easier and cleaner.
That's what I'm up to, but I have to know how to re
> I tested it on my machine and it raises ValueError on:
>
> * Python 2.4.6
> * Python 2.5.5
> * Python 2.6.6
> * Python 2.7.0+
> * Python 3.1.2
>
> If you have version 2.6.1, you should upgrade. I don't think Django
> should support a Python bug that was fixed almost 2 years ago.
>
Cool
On 2 December 2010 15:43, Dan Fairs wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Apologies for the slightly lengthy email.
>
> I'm working on getting ticket #2705 (Add optional FOR UPDATE clause to
> QuerySets) into shape, primarily by adding tests to the patch. I'm writing a
> test for a backend's FOR UPDATE NOWAIT, and h
Hi,
> On 12/02/2010 03:43 PM, Dan Fairs wrote:
>> My gut feeling is that this boils down to this vastly simplified
>> demonstration of how list() works:
>>
> class Foo(object):
>> ... def __len__(self):
>> ... print 'len called'
>> ... raise ValueError
>> ... def __iter__(self):
Hi Dan,
On 12/02/2010 03:43 PM, Dan Fairs wrote:
My gut feeling is that this boils down to this vastly simplified demonstration
of how list() works:
class Foo(object):
... def __len__(self):
... print 'len called'
... raise ValueError
... def __iter__(self):
... return iter([
Hi,
Apologies for the slightly lengthy email.
I'm working on getting ticket #2705 (Add optional FOR UPDATE clause to
QuerySets) into shape, primarily by adding tests to the patch. I'm writing a
test for a backend's FOR UPDATE NOWAIT, and have come across some interesting
behaviour where Databa
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 4:50 PM, Jacob Burch wrote:
> What I"m doing now (returning None) is already fairly magical.
Isn't that broken?
set(KEY, "a", timeout=100)
set(KEY, "b", timeout=0)
get(KEY)
won't returning None from the set(..., 0) instead of sending the
instant-expire through to memcac
14 matches
Mail list logo
