Re: Custum permission bug

2010-10-30 Thread Ramiro Morales
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 9:12 AM, Narciso Oceguera wrote: > Hi, everyone. > > As documentation said, I just added the lines: > > class USCitizen(models.Model): >   # ... > >   class Meta: >       permissions = ( >           ("can_drive", "Can drive"), >           ("can_vote", "Can vote in elections

Re: Custum permission bug

2010-10-30 Thread Michael
Do you have South in your INSTALLED_APPS? I've noticed it doesn't fire the appropriate syncdb signals. -- Michael On Fri, 2010-10-29 at 08:46 +0800, Russell Keith-Magee wrote: > On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 8:12 PM, Narciso Oceguera wrote: > > Hi, everyone. > > > > As documentation said, I just ad

Re: Gentle Proposal: add 'render' shortcut in 1.3

2010-10-30 Thread Ivan Sagalaev
On 10/30/2010 10:47 PM, SmileyChris wrote: It seems a simple enough proposal that trying to access the content property would raise an error until it is explicitly baked. Problem solved. True. I seem to somehow missed it between the lines. Thanks! I'm +1 on it by the way. -- You received thi

Re: Gentle Proposal: add 'render' shortcut in 1.3

2010-10-30 Thread SmileyChris
On Oct 31, 8:26 am, Ivan Sagalaev wrote: > Russel and others: do you think the issue of accidental baking is a > show-stopper here? It seems a simple enough proposal that trying to access the content property would raise an error until it is explicitly baked. Problem solved. -- You received t

Re: Gentle Proposal: add 'render' shortcut in 1.3

2010-10-30 Thread Ivan Sagalaev
On 10/29/2010 09:38 PM, Carl Meyer wrote: Seems that a template-response-middleware might reasonably want to look at some other response data (headers? or simply extra annotation attributes?) in order to make decisions about what to do. You right. And it's not feasible (or beautiful) to just ri

Re: CUBRID as Django bakend

2010-10-30 Thread George Sakkis
On Oct 30, 3:47 pm, Luke Plant wrote: > On Sat, 2010-10-30 at 05:59 -0700, Alex wrote: > > Hello, > > > Are there any plans to add CUBRID -http://www.cubrid.org/ad Django > > backend? > > > Seems to be very optimized DB for web application (opensource with > > internal support clastering, partitio

Re: contrib.staticfiles app concerns

2010-10-30 Thread Waldemar Kornewald
Hi Mikhail, On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 1:22 PM, Mikhail Korobov wrote: > Hi Waldemar, > > The problem was really hard to understand for me because I was > assuming you're trying to describe django.contrib.staticfiles flaw > while you were describing the problem with third-party asset managers. It s

Re: contrib.staticfiles app concerns

2010-10-30 Thread Mikhail Korobov
Hi Waldemar, The problem was really hard to understand for me because I was assuming you're trying to describe django.contrib.staticfiles flaw while you were describing the problem with third-party asset managers. I think you have described a real problem here but (as you said) this problem is no

Re: CUBRID as Django bakend

2010-10-30 Thread Luke Plant
On Sat, 2010-10-30 at 05:59 -0700, Alex wrote: > Hello, > > Are there any plans to add CUBRID - http://www.cubrid.org/ ad Django > backend? > > Seems to be very optimized DB for web application (opensource with > internal support clastering, partitioning, efficient paging support) There are no p

Re: CUBRID as Django bakend

2010-10-30 Thread Russell Keith-Magee
On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 8:59 PM, Alex wrote: > Hello, > > Are there any plans to add CUBRID - http://www.cubrid.org/ ad Django > backend? > > Seems to be very optimized DB for web application (opensource with > internal support clastering, partitioning, efficient paging support) Given that I've n

CUBRID as Django bakend

2010-10-30 Thread Alex
Hello, Are there any plans to add CUBRID - http://www.cubrid.org/ ad Django backend? Seems to be very optimized DB for web application (opensource with internal support clastering, partitioning, efficient paging support) Thanks, Alex -- You received this message because you are subscribed to t

Re: contrib.staticfiles app concerns

2010-10-30 Thread Waldemar Kornewald
Hi Yuri, On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 1:22 PM, burc...@gmail.com wrote: > Hi Waldemar, > > So, we agreed, it's not a problem with django, it's problem with those > 3rd-party apps. Yes, exactly! That's why I wanted an official standard that all 3rd-party apps can follow. > Perhaps, you can write emai

Re: contrib.staticfiles app concerns

2010-10-30 Thread burc...@gmail.com
Hi Waldemar, So, we agreed, it's not a problem with django, it's problem with those 3rd-party apps. Perhaps, you can write emails to their authors now explaining your position? Actually, it's not a problem that 70% of those apps are broken -- in other areas, the percent of "wrong" solutions can b

Re: contrib.staticfiles app concerns

2010-10-30 Thread Waldemar Kornewald
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 10:32 PM, Jacob Kaplan-Moss wrote: > There's no way I'm adding text like that to the staticfiles > documentation. Not in a million years. It's confusing to me, and > *I've* been following this discussion. Can you imagine how confusing > that's going to be to people who *hav