Stephen Kelly wrote:
> Stephen Kelly wrote:
>
>> Łukasz Rekucki wrote:
>>
>>> On 19 October 2010 23:41, Jacob Kaplan-Moss
>>> wrote:
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 4:31 PM, James Bennett
wrote:
> If we're going to do this, could we also look at deprecating the
> 'templatetag' templa
Stephen Kelly wrote:
> Łukasz Rekucki wrote:
>
>> On 19 October 2010 23:41, Jacob Kaplan-Moss
>> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 4:31 PM, James Bennett
>>> wrote:
If we're going to do this, could we also look at deprecating the
'templatetag' template tag? There are a couple cases a
Łukasz Rekucki wrote:
> On 19 October 2010 23:41, Jacob Kaplan-Moss
> wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 4:31 PM, James Bennett
>> wrote:
>>> If we're going to do this, could we also look at deprecating the
>>> 'templatetag' template tag? There are a couple cases a 'verbatim' tag
>>> wouldn't cov
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 1:25 AM, Valentin Golev wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm trying to use brand new Class Based Views and I have a question
> about implementation.
>
> Let's take a look at SingleObjectMixin.get_object():
> http://code.djangoproject.com/browser/django/trunk/django/views/generic/detail.
On 19 October 2010 23:41, Jacob Kaplan-Moss wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 4:31 PM, James Bennett wrote:
>> If we're going to do this, could we also look at deprecating the
>> 'templatetag' template tag? There are a couple cases a 'verbatim' tag
>> wouldn't cover that 'templatetag' wouldn't, bu
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 4:31 PM, James Bennett wrote:
> If we're going to do this, could we also look at deprecating the
> 'templatetag' template tag? There are a couple cases a 'verbatim' tag
> wouldn't cover that 'templatetag' wouldn't, but I'm kinda hard-pressed
> to think of when they'd ever c
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 1:49 PM, Jacob Kaplan-Moss wrote:
> Looks like a good idea to me. I've certainly used ssi as a hack for
> this before, so getting a noparse/verbatim tag into Django sounds
> great.
If we're going to do this, could we also look at deprecating the
'templatetag' template tag?
Given 2 +1s, I've added a ticket:
http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/14502
On Oct 19, 6:49 pm, Jacob Kaplan-Moss wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 12:24 PM, David Gouldin wrote:
> > Thoughts/opinions?
>
> Looks like a good idea to me. I've certainly used ssi as a hack for
> this before, so get
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 12:24 PM, David Gouldin wrote:
> Thoughts/opinions?
Looks like a good idea to me. I've certainly used ssi as a hack for
this before, so getting a noparse/verbatim tag into Django sounds
great.
Jacob
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google G
I agree that something like this is becoming more necessary, as I ran
into this a few days ago myself.
Funny how similar our strategies were (David's is more robust):
http://gist.github.com/629508
-Eric Florenzano
On Oct 19, 10:24 am, David Gouldin wrote:
> As client-side templates become more p
Sorry! I've hit "Enter" key accidentally while writing a subject.
Don't blame me too much, please :)
On 19 окт, 21:22, Valentin Golev wrote:
> Hello
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to djan
Hello,
I'm trying to use brand new Class Based Views and I have a question
about implementation.
Let's take a look at SingleObjectMixin.get_object():
http://code.djangoproject.com/browser/django/trunk/django/views/generic/detail.py
Why does it use function arguments, and not self.kwargs, while,
As client-side templates become more popular, it is increasingly
likely that django's template language will not be the only one
present in a template. (jQuery's new template language makes frequent
use of curly braces in its syntax.) At the same time, the assumption
that all template syntax shou
Hello
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-develop...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
django-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options,
Hello
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-develop...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
django-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options,
Hi Russell!
> Even if you are using L10N, there are occasions when localized widgets
> *aren't* the right thing to do.
>
> Consider as an example: Australian postcodes are 4 digit numbers. It's
> entirely reasonable that they might be stored as an IntegerField. But
> it would be completely inappro
Added ticket and patch: http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/14492
On Oct 17, 12:00 pm, Byron wrote:
> I came across an issue when comparing a model proxy instance and a
> model instance, that is:
>
> obj1 = Entry.objects.get(id=1)
> obj2 = EntryProxy.objects.get(id=1)
>
> obj1 == obj
On 19 October 2010 05:10, Russell Keith-Magee wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 10:29 AM, Will Hardy wrote:
>> Whilst I agree that messing with contrib.auth is likely to break
>> something and create more work, I think it would be good for Django if
>> everyone in the Django community went and nee
18 matches
Mail list logo
