On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 11:29 PM, David Malcolm wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-08-11 at 14:48 +0200, Dennis Kaarsemaker wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 2:20 AM, Russell Keith-Magee
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Like it or not, RHEL is still a major player in the enterprise market
>> > at the moment. I can't speak f
I think this is somewhat ameliorated by being able to link to the
current trunk documents these days. Many incoming links will be going
there. Additionally, for old documents, there is the "these docs are
old" message at the top. It might be beneficial to make that easier to
see for a user who gets
On Wed, 2010-08-11 at 14:48 +0200, Dennis Kaarsemaker wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 2:20 AM, Russell Keith-Magee
> wrote:
>
> > Like it or not, RHEL is still a major player in the enterprise market
> > at the moment. I can't speak for the US, but in Australia at least --
> > when all those com
Often times I'll be trying to search for something like "Model Ordering".
The problem is that old docs come up first (being older, more linked)
The old docs don't even have links to corresponding areas in the new docs,
and oftentimes there isn't one corresponding area.
It seems like this issue was
Yeah - we're stuck with CentOS into the foreseeable future. Manually
compiling Python to a different prefix, and then recompiling mod_wsgi
and other modules against this version is really not an option at this
point. If Django 1.3 deprecated support for Python 2.4, then we would
be forced to remain
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 2:20 AM, Russell Keith-Magee
wrote:
> Like it or not, RHEL is still a major player in the enterprise market
> at the moment. I can't speak for the US, but in Australia at least --
> when all those companies got on the Linux bandwagon in the mid 2000's,
> they all adopted R
