On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 00:00, Russell Keith-Magee
wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 3:55 PM, Lachlan Musicman wrote:
>> Hola,
>>
>> I'm new to this dev thing, but I've done some work on ticket #5373
>
> Thanks for pitching in! Hopefully I'll be able to give you enough
> feedback to progress this is
On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 7:24 AM, Russell Keith-Magee
wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 12:49 AM, Carl Meyer wrote:
>> On Jul 7, 7:11 pm, Graham Dumpleton
>> wrote:
>> [snip]
>>> web application, to be a well behaved WSGI citizen, should honour
>>> SCRIPT_NAME setting as supplied by the server, an
> I'll put it on my todo list; if anyone else wants to give it a sanity
> check, I'd appreciate the extra eyeballs.
Looks pretty sane to me, though I wonder if the deserialisation should
raise an exception if the pk is missing and an incomplete set of
natural key fields is provided? Nice work, tha
On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 12:49 AM, Carl Meyer wrote:
> On Jul 7, 7:11 pm, Graham Dumpleton
> wrote:
> [snip]
>> web application, to be a well behaved WSGI citizen, should honour
>> SCRIPT_NAME setting as supplied by the server, and ensure that ways
>> are provided such that everything in the users
On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 12:19 AM, burc...@gmail.com wrote:
> Tom,
>
> HTTP_HOST and other don't solve the multiple-host deployment, and it
> is a solution you can do by yourself if you need.
>
> I'd like to see better solution: ability to make reverse work for such URLs.
> I think, currently the p
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 6:47 PM, Tom Evans wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 3:40 PM, Russell Keith-Magee
> wrote:
>> Personally, I see this as a case of explicit vs implicit.
>>
>> As currently defined, LOGIN_URL points to the login URL. Period.
>>
>> Under the proposed patch, the onus is on every
Hello,
On Jul 9, 9:13 pm, SmileyChris wrote:
> It seems that my ticket in http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/13252
> covers this. It's ready for review if anyone wants to give it a
> spin...
That patch indeed matches mine, but yours is of course much further
along.
Javier Guerra Giraldez wrot
2010/7/10 Russell Keith-Magee :
> On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 1:15 AM, Antoni Aloy wrote:
> Are you sure that this is a regression, rather than a bugfix with
> unfortunate side effects? In particular, I draw your attention to the
> second note under:
>
> http://docs.djangoproject.com/en/1.2/topics/i1
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 1:50 PM, Nowell Strite wrote:
> When Django 1.1 was released URLs gained the ability to be nested with
> namespaces by adding "app_name" and "namespace" attributes to the
> include(...) functions within urls.py. The reverse(...) function was
> updated to allow you to specify
On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 10:45 PM, Nowell Strite wrote:
> Recently I started working on a project (django-versions) to enable
> versioning of model data with Mercurial. In doing so, I came across
> the need to have access to more data about the relationships that
> Django Related Manager's create. F
On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 1:15 AM, Antoni Aloy wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Have anybody (Marc Garcia ?) check
> http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/13621 ticket. It explains a bug
> concerning date and time formats. The admin does not conform the i18n
> locale settings on displaying time and date formats a
11 matches
Mail list logo
