On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 3:13 AM, SmileyChris wrote:
> On Jul 10, 1:47 am, Stijn Hoop wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am trying to use the 'natural keys' feature of django to make a sort
>> of "future proof" fixture loading possible.
>> [...]
>> With the patch linked below[1] I have successfully used dumpda
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 10:37 PM, Ric wrote:
> i'll reply one by one
>
> * What if you have multiple models referring to Author? Do you
> assume
> that every related model will be updated the same way?
>
> * What if you have multiple foreign keys from Blog to Author? Do you
> assume that every fo
Hi Chris,
you're not 100% correct with this statement:
370 When ``use_natural_keys=True`` is specified, the primary key is
no longer
371 provided in the serialized data of this object since it can be
calculated
372 during deserialization::
since in other old fi
On Jul 10, 1:47 am, Stijn Hoop wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to use the 'natural keys' feature of django to make a sort
> of "future proof" fixture loading possible.
> [...]
> With the patch linked below[1] I have successfully used dumpdata and
> loaddata for a .json export of my tables. Of course
Hello,
Have anybody (Marc Garcia ?) check
http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/13621 ticket. It explains a bug
concerning date and time formats. The admin does not conform the i18n
locale settings on displaying time and date formats and reverts to the
default format.
It seems a true regression te
On Jul 7, 7:11 pm, Graham Dumpleton
wrote:
[snip]
> web application, to be a well behaved WSGI citizen, should honour
> SCRIPT_NAME setting as supplied by the server, and ensure that ways
> are provided such that everything in the users code, including
> configuration, urls or settings files, can
Tom,
HTTP_HOST and other don't solve the multiple-host deployment, and it
is a solution you can do by yourself if you need.
I'd like to see better solution: ability to make reverse work for such URLs.
I think, currently the problem is in the binding time:
The load order is typically the followin
Hi Jonathan,
I don't believe you really need that complicated structure:
extends -> includes -> extends.
If I were you and had this problem, I'd rewrite it to something more simple.
However, you can use {% block %} with my
http://github.com/buriy/django-containers :
:: file.html ::
{% render
i'll reply one by one
* What if you have multiple models referring to Author? Do you
assume
that every related model will be updated the same way?
* What if you have multiple foreign keys from Blog to Author? Do you
assume that every foreign key on a single model will be updated in
the
same way
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 8:47 AM, Stijn Hoop wrote:
> This is rather impossible without natural keys, for I cannot know the
> maximum ID of any primary key of tables that they have added data to.
> However with natural keys I can do away with recording the numerical
> ID of an object so this should
On 9 July 2010 13:25, Yuval Adam wrote:
> But what is the easiest way to do this? Shouldn't Django supply some
> wrapper for comet functionality?
>
I imagine this is really out of the scope of Django but I might be missing
something. I'm no expert and haven't done much more than read about comet
Hi,
I am trying to use the 'natural keys' feature of django to make a sort
of "future proof" fixture loading possible.
By "future proof" I mean that I want a site administrator to be able
to add new objects to database tables where I will provide initial
data. But I also want to be able to add ne
On Thu, 2010-07-08 at 15:58 -0500, Alex Gaynor wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 3:51 PM, Simon Riggs wrote:
> > On Mon, 2010-07-05 at 00:59 -0700, Simon Litchfield wrote:
> >> > If you can come up with answers to these points, I might get
> >> > interested. 1 and 2 are fairly trivial; I can think o
Something related, that we could really use is passing not just
variables to the include, but also blocks. I tried to implement a
template tag for this, but it doesn't work together with how Django
replaces blocks in the extended template at compile time instead of
during the renderering.
I would
Hi guys.
I failed to find any serious documentation on how to do comet (AKA
HTTP push) on Django.
Obviously Django does not (and will not?) support this out-of-the-box
due to the way Django is deployed, and naturally you will need to use
an external server (orbited and twisted come to mind).
But
On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 3:40 PM, Russell Keith-Magee
wrote:
> Personally, I see this as a case of explicit vs implicit.
>
> As currently defined, LOGIN_URL points to the login URL. Period.
>
> Under the proposed patch, the onus is on every possible script to
> ensure that the script prefix has been
After all it was a misconfiguration of my system and not a problem of
Python or Django.
Somehow the special files /dev/random and /dev/urandom got screwed up.
I suppose it was the outcome of a bad update of the udev package on my
Archlinux system.
When I recreated the node of /dev/urandom manually
17 matches
Mail list logo
