Re: How to do User Defined Fields?

2010-06-18 Thread Russell Keith-Magee
On Friday, June 18, 2010, zweb wrote: > I want users of my app to be able to define their own fields in > addition to the already existing fields. > > These fields will be displayed on webpage, in form and saved in > database. > > Fields can be of any of the standard types. > > Any way to do it in

Re: Project-wide cache prefix (low-level API)

2010-06-18 Thread Byron
Opened a ticket and added my patch.. http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/13795 On Jun 15, 7:15 pm, Giuseppe Ciotta wrote: > On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 1:04 AM, Giuseppe Ciotta wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 12:46 AM, Jeremy Dunck wrote: > >> On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 7:18 AM, lenz wrote: > >>>

How to do User Defined Fields?

2010-06-18 Thread zweb
I want users of my app to be able to define their own fields in addition to the already existing fields. These fields will be displayed on webpage, in form and saved in database. Fields can be of any of the standard types. Any way to do it in django? -- You received this message because you ar

Re: transaction.commit_manually masks uncaught exception

2010-06-18 Thread Thomas Guettler
Hi, I closed the ticket, since it looks like a duplicate of http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/6623 BTW, the tiny url does not work for me. Google wants me to log-in. Thomas JohnO wrote: > I wanted to offer an enhancement that would make > transaction.commit_manually much friendlier to wor

Feature Request

2010-06-18 Thread Massimiliano della Rovere
EmailField, UrlField, Foreign Key, OneToOneField and ManyToManyField clickable in the admin changelist interface of Django 1.3: if you click you are redirected to: - Foreign Key, OneToOneField and ManyToManyField: the change page of the linked object - EmailField, UrlField as in a web browser --

Re: Class based generic views in 1.3?

2010-06-18 Thread Patryk Zawadzki
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 9:22 AM, Waldemar Kornewald wrote: > On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 10:45 PM, Jacob Kaplan-Moss > wrote: >> On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 3:41 PM, Alex Gaynor wrote: >>> So here's an idea, of dubious quality ;) >> Okay, folks: at this point the discussion has pretty much descended >>

Re: Class based generic views in 1.3?

2010-06-18 Thread Waldemar Kornewald
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 10:45 PM, Jacob Kaplan-Moss wrote: > On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 3:41 PM, Alex Gaynor wrote: >> So here's an idea, of dubious quality ;) > > Okay, folks: at this point the discussion has pretty much descended > into bikeshedding territory. I'm going to read through everything