Re: Opinions sought on m2m signal ordering

2010-03-28 Thread George Vilches
On Mar 27, 2010, at 1:08 PM, Russell Keith-Magee wrote: > Option 3: We modify the existing signals so we have a pre-post pair > for every signal. This maintains the analog with pre/post save, and > gives the most control. For example, on Alex Gaynor has suggested to > me that some people might wa

Re: GSoC - Class based serializers

2010-03-28 Thread Russell Keith-Magee
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 12:22 AM, Renato Garcia Pedigoni wrote: > Hi Alex and Russel >> * Your schedule is so vague it borders on being comical. I generally >> use the rule of thumb that if a proposal contains a body of work >> longer than a week, the person making the proposal doesn't understand

Re: GSoC - Class based serializers

2010-03-28 Thread Rajeev J Sebastian
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 5:33 AM, Alex Gaynor wrote: > On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 5:56 PM, Renato Garcia Pedigoni > wrote: >> Hi folks >> My name is Renato, I'm currently studying Biomedical Informatics at the >> University of Sao Paulo, in Brazil. >> Last year I tried a GSoC slot with a declarative s

Re: GSoC - Class based serializers

2010-03-28 Thread Renato Garcia Pedigoni
Hi Alex and Russel First, sorry for the delay, and thank you for reading my proposal and commenting on it. * A generic view that works with the serializer is probably a good > idea, but is orthogonal to the task of building a customizable > serializer. The serializer should be standalone. If you

Re: Opinions sought on m2m signal ordering

2010-03-28 Thread Firat Can Basarir
However I still believe, as a user of the framework, having 2 signals, before and after, are the best way to go. It is the most intuitive and clear way to provide this functionality. On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 4:44 PM, Firat Can Basarir < firatcanbasa...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Sat, Mar 27, 2010

Re: Opinions sought on m2m signal ordering

2010-03-28 Thread Firat Can Basarir
On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 8:08 PM, Russell Keith-Magee wrote: > Hi all, > > One of the new features in 1.2 are signals on m2m operations [1]. > > Recently, Ticket #13087 was opened questioning the order in which m2m > signals are sent. I'm calling for any comments or opinions on exactly > how this

LocaleMiddleware breaks caching

2010-03-28 Thread Harm Verhagen
Hi, I found out using i18n with django breaks caching completely. (reverse proxy & browser caching, that is). Initially I filed a bug about this [1], But its more complicated that just a bug. Therefor I post the topic here. Whats the problem: enabling django.middleware.locale.LocaleMiddleware,