On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 8:55 AM, Gabriel Hurley wrote:
> Having been bitten by issue #1480 personally, I'm wondering what the
> status of this ticket really is? Trac indicates it needs a better
> patch and better docs, but there's no information about what changes
> are needed.
>
> If someone will
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 11:54 AM, Eric Holscher wrote:
> Hey everyone,
>
> During the sprints, I worked to set up a hudson instance for Django. This is
> hopefully going to be the way that we are going to go forward for now with
> doing continuous integration for Django. I have a pretty good setup
changeset 12525 added code that would prematurely exit from the
reponse_action method of ModelAdmin if it detected that the "Go"
button was not pressed. However this meant the "delete selected"
action would not be performed because the view was being posted to
from the confirmation screen.
I've o
I think this is a great move and will be an awesome resource for the
community. I'm working on getting some CPU time at the OSU OSL and/or from
Caktus to contribute to the effort.
Cheers,
Tobias
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 11:08 PM, Sean O'Connor wrote:
> A platform we probably should get into the
A platform we probably should get into the mix is a CentOS/RHEL 5 box. I
suspect a significant portion of the community is stuck on such boxes and
given the ancient versions of everything available under RHEL I'm sure that
there are things which will break there and not in a developer's standard
e
Hey everyone,
During the sprints, I worked to set up a hudson instance for Django. This is
hopefully going to be the way that we are going to go forward for now with
doing continuous integration for Django. I have a pretty good setup going
currently, and want make it really fantastic. At this poin
Having been bitten by issue #1480 personally, I'm wondering what the
status of this ticket really is? Trac indicates it needs a better
patch and better docs, but there's no information about what changes
are needed.
If someone will give me some guidance, I'd be happy to wrap this one
up and see it
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 6:39 AM, Stephen Wolff wrote:
> On 25/02/2010 20:05, SmileyChris wrote:
>>
>> Just two small points I'd like to highlight:
>>
>> On Feb 26, 3:50 am, Russell Keith-Magee
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> I'm not casting blame here. Those doing triage work are doing a great
>>> job. I'm j
On 25/02/2010 20:05, SmileyChris wrote:
Just two small points I'd like to highlight:
On Feb 26, 3:50 am, Russell Keith-Magee
wrote:
I'm not casting blame here. Those doing triage work are doing a great
job. I'm just pointing out that we have a problem. Despite the best
efforts of our volun
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 3:05 PM, SmileyChris wrote:
>
> But I do think it's critical to see a new 1.1 release before 1.2 is
> out - if for no other reason than having {% csrf_token %} in a 1.1
> official release.
>
>
Before 1.2 is out or at the same time as 1.2 goes out? We normally do a
final m
Just two small points I'd like to highlight:
On Feb 26, 3:50 am, Russell Keith-Magee
wrote:
> I'm not casting blame here. Those doing triage work are doing a great
> job. I'm just pointing out that we have a problem. Despite the best
> efforts of our volunteer triage team, they haven't been able
Since I just wrestled with this issue (albeit from a different
direction),
it would be really nice if the behavior was, if nothing else,
consistent.
On Feb 24, 8:33 pm, SmileyChris wrote:
> My ticket in #6510 [1] deals with this, along with a nice abstraction
> of common recursive nodelist gather
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 3:43 AM, Jeremy Dunck wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 11:14 AM, Tobias McNulty
> wrote:
> ...
>> I'm hoping this will spark a discussion about how we can work more
>> efficiently and put donated time to better use. I may be a bit biased,
>> because this is coming on the
> This kind of sounds nice, but perhaps some sort of django namespace
> could be introduced. Meaning $jQD -> dj.$:
>
>
>
> var dj = {};
> dj.$ = dj.jQuery = jQuery.noConflict(true);
>
This is a great idea, it also means that we could have a setting for
specifying which libraries to add to t
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 12:29 AM, Chris Adams wrote:
> We've been collecting various tweaks to the stock Django 1.1.1 which
> have been requested by our 508 testers. I'd appreciate it if someone
> could review these tickets:
>
> Add scope=col to changelist table headers:
> http://code.djangoprojec
15 matches
Mail list logo
