On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 4:21 PM, Mario Briggs wrote:
> Russ,
>
>> With a different coat of paint, it might be more palatable. A name
>> like ShortTextField presupposes the storage implementation, but tells
>> you nothing about the appropriate usage. However, a different name -
>> something like Ge
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 4:49 AM, slango wrote:
> Hello all. I'm new to the Django community, but I have an itch that
> needs scratching and some time off to scratch it. The itch, of course,
> is composite primary and foreign keys in Django.
>
> I've started to speak with David Cramer on the issue.
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 6:07 AM, noel wrote:
> I really love this application Reinteract. Its an enhancement to
> Python Interactive Shell. And it would be lovely if I can use
> Reinteract with manage.py shell.
Before submitting feature requests, please check the release cycle;
Django 1.2's featu
On Nov 27, 10:07 pm, noel wrote:
> I really love this application Reinteract. Its an enhancement to
> Python Interactive Shell. And it would be lovely if I can use
> Reinteract with manage.py shell.
Have a look at bpython. I have a command set up where I can run
./manage.py bshell
And I get a
Hello all. I'm new to the Django community, but I have an itch that
needs scratching and some time off to scratch it. The itch, of course,
is composite primary and foreign keys in Django.
I've started to speak with David Cramer on the issue. Several months
ago, he was pursuing a solution which he
Since this would obviously create a lot of external dependecies of Django
package (X, GTK, reinteract). I'd prefer if you'd just create a reausable
app, that would add ./manage.py reinteract command.
Ales
--
Ales Zoulek
+420 604 332 515
Jabber
I really love this application Reinteract. Its an enhancement to
Python Interactive Shell. And it would be lovely if I can use
Reinteract with manage.py shell.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django developers" group.
To post to this group, send emai
Richard,
> I don't know why a user should have .filter(object_id='1')
> fail, as that breaks the ORM abstraction. Maybe that's not what you're
> suggesting?
I am saying exactly what i am saying. So here's my example that does
the same thing in a java ORM
// Here's the model
@Entity
public class
