On Oct 4, 9:22 pm, Ivan Sagalaev wrote:
> I see one problem with explicitly calling a function from settings.py.
> This will execute instantiation of handlers and all the user staff very
> early when settings aren't fully configured yet. This prevents a user to
> have a handler that will use Dj
On Oct 4, 8:55 pm, Ivan Sagalaev wrote:
> Uhm... No this is not about hand-holding or something like that. I
> propose a format that is shorter and more convenient than the
> ConfigParser's. This is the point.
>
> > My reservation with Django's own take on it is simply
> > that it goes against
Vinay Sajip wrote:
> We should provide a configure_logging(dict) utility function which
> takes a dict in an agreed format (such as Ivan's suggestion). Then in
> settings.py users can invoke configure_logging(LOGGING) after
> defining the configuration right there, in settings.py itself, or
> obt
Sorry for taking a bit long to respond. Looks like we aren't disagree
much anyway but I had to get some thoughts off my chest :-).
Vinay Sajip wrote:
> It's similar to Django's support for, say, simplejson. I think it's
> reasonable for Django to alias WatchedFileHandler so that it's
> available
