On Sep 14, 8:05 am, Russell Keith-Magee
wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 4:30 AM, Bret Taylor wrote:
>
> > I am one of the authors of Tornado (http://www.tornadoweb.org/), the
> > web server/framework we built at FriendFeed that we open sourced last
> > week (seehttp://bret.appspot.com/entry/t
On Sep 13, 3:05 pm, Russell Keith-Magee
wrote:
> > I chose the WSGI approach because it is generic and applies to all
> > frameworks, but Django is obviously the most widely used. I am curious
> > if there is any benefit to implementing more "native" support in
> > django.core.handlers or if WSGI
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 4:30 AM, Bret Taylor wrote:
>
> I am one of the authors of Tornado (http://www.tornadoweb.org/), the
> web server/framework we built at FriendFeed that we open sourced last
> week (see http://bret.appspot.com/entry/tornado-web-server).
>
> I just checked in change to Torna
I am one of the authors of Tornado (http://www.tornadoweb.org/), the
web server/framework we built at FriendFeed that we open sourced last
week (see http://bret.appspot.com/entry/tornado-web-server).
I just checked in change to Tornado that enables you to run any WSGI-
compatible framework on Tor
By magic I meant magic methods; rather than creating a class and
defining __str__() or __unicode__() on it, why not just use a unicode
subclass?
And the micro-DSL is 100% optional. All of the operator overrides are
aliases to other methods, with the exception of __and__() and __or__
(), wh
Zachary Voase wrote:
> If you take a look, you’ll notice that URLObject, being a subclass of
> unicode, can be used *directly* within the template and it'll render
> out to the URL without any magic.
Beware! Using the word "magic" too loosely may infuriate certain core
devs and they will sta
If you take a look, you’ll notice that URLObject, being a subclass of
unicode, can be used *directly* within the template and it'll render
out to the URL without any magic.
In addition, you can ensure that the URLObject is host-relative by
doing `url.without_host()` (or {{ url.without_host
Jacob Kaplan-Moss wrote:
>>> schema, domain, path, query, fragment = urlsplit(obj.url())
>
> That's not in any way intitutive for a new user in the way that
> `obj.url().schema` is.
After thinking of it a bit more I agree about new users. My main concern
though was about not using an estab
On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 1:36 AM, Alex Gaynor wrote:
>
> Hey!
>
> On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 6:40 AM, Jacob Kaplan-Moss wrote:
>>
>> Hi folks --
>>
>> I'd like to start thinking about merging the SoC branches. As far as I
>> can tell we've got solid, worth-merging work out of all six of 'em --
>> WO
drozzy wrote:
> Sorry about the attitude, sometimes I think a bit too much of myself.
> When do you think will get implemented?
I'm not the one who decides :-). I've just raised another voice claiming
that that decision may be worth reconsidering.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--
10 matches
Mail list logo