On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 8:56 AM, Craig Kimerer wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 5:00 PM, Russell Keith-Magee
> wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 7:14 AM, Craig Kimerer
>> wrote:
>> > I've spent a little time using this branch and looking at the
>> > possibility of
>> > using it with my projec
On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 5:00 PM, Russell Keith-Magee
wrote:
>
> On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 7:14 AM, Craig Kimerer
> wrote:
> > I've spent a little time using this branch and looking at the possibility
> of
> > using it with my project. Below is a short list of problems and ponies
> that
> > I have enc
On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 7:14 AM, Craig Kimerer wrote:
> I've spent a little time using this branch and looking at the possibility of
> using it with my project. Below is a short list of problems and ponies that
> I have encountered (or want).
>
> 1. It'd be awesome if we could mark certain databas
Hello there!
I'm looking for any open source project that uses django 1.x as platform for
study proposal. I've already in touch with djangobook.com and other stuffs
but I'm still missing something more close to real world.
Is there any pet shop app or something like that?
Thank you very much!
-
I've spent a little time using this branch and looking at the possibility of
using it with my project. Below is a short list of problems and ponies that
I have encountered (or want).
1. It'd be awesome if we could mark certain databases as slaves. Inserts /
deletes / creates / drops would only r
Is there any plan for having the GenericForeignKey fields operate the
same or similar way as the ForeignKey fields do in the administration
interface? I saw a thread back in 2006 that this was being added.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you
Hi I've submitted a patch for this bug that I'd like to have considered for
some trunk action... I can't take the credit for all the work on this, but
it seems I'm taking the initiative to get it resolved.
I really only had one question about a particular change that was needed in
order for the
On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 5:10 PM, Anssi Kaariainen wrote:
>
> Hello all,
>
> The problem I am trying to solve is this: I have defined some views
> and corresponding models with managed = False. Now when I issue
> manage.py reset I get an error because the views block dropping the
> tables. I need to
On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 4:21 PM, Waldemar Kornewald wrote:
>
> Also, when will your branch be merged into trunk? Is there any
> roadmap?
When It's Done (tm) :-)
I would like to think this is on target for v1.2, but that does depend
somewhat on solving one or two outstanding design issues. So,
op
Hello all,
The problem I am trying to solve is this: I have defined some views
and corresponding models with managed = False. Now when I issue
manage.py reset I get an error because the views block dropping the
tables. I need to manually drop the views before I issue manage.py
reset.
I am thinki
Hi Alex,
On Sep 2, 5:47 pm, Alex Gaynor wrote:
> As Russ says this is something causing problems for multi-db. I think
> it's important to recognize that there are 2 "types" of backends,
> something like Oracle/DB2/MsSQL that is fundamentally the same
> architecture as the existing SQL backend
11 matches
Mail list logo
