Re: Django settings paths mess

2009-08-14 Thread Graham Dumpleton
On Aug 15, 1:15 pm, Yuri Baburov wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm trying to figure out correct overall and settings path usage > strategy for my Django applications. > What I am experiencing now is that settings.py is imported 4 times on > "python manage.py runserver" command, > twice as "settings", an

Django settings paths mess

2009-08-14 Thread Yuri Baburov
Hi all, I'm trying to figure out correct overall and settings path usage strategy for my Django applications. What I am experiencing now is that settings.py is imported 4 times on "python manage.py runserver" command, twice as "settings", and twice as "myapp.settings", given that my project is na

Re: Ticket #7539 (ON DELETE support) in Django 1.2?

2009-08-14 Thread Michael Glassford
Russell Keith-Magee wrote: > On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 8:09 AM, hcarvalhoalves > wrote: >> On Aug 13, 9:30 am, Russell Keith-Magee >> wrote: >>> On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 12:04 AM, Michael Glassford >>> wrote: >>> >>> Secondly: I'm sensitive to the extent that 'on delete cascade' et al >>> are phra

Re: Ticket #7539 (ON DELETE support) in Django 1.2?

2009-08-14 Thread Russell Keith-Magee
On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 8:09 AM, hcarvalhoalves wrote: > > On Aug 13, 9:30 am, Russell Keith-Magee > wrote: >> On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 12:04 AM, Michael Glassford >> wrote: >> >> Secondly: I'm sensitive to the extent that 'on delete cascade' et al >> are phrased in SQL specific terms. I fully ac

Re: 1.2 Proposal: Extra template tags and filters

2009-08-14 Thread John
On Aug 11, 7:50 am, Richard Davies wrote: > Hi all, > > With 1.1 out of the door (great!), here's a thought for 1.2... > > I often end up writing the same couple of template tags and filters. I > think some of these are general enough and useful enough that they > should be considered for basic D

Re: HttpResponseStreaming, ticket #7581, and [soc2009/http-wsgi-improvements] Final(?) status update

2009-08-14 Thread Tai Lee
On Aug 15, 3:19 am, ccahoon wrote: > This is the case, yes, if the HTTP and GZip middleware are not used. > We had to modify both of those to make sure they didn't consume the > content generator to find the Content-Length. I imagine, IF we wanted > to, setting the Content-Length header could be

Re: Ticket #7539 (ON DELETE support) in Django 1.2?

2009-08-14 Thread hcarvalhoalves
On Aug 13, 9:30 am, Russell Keith-Magee wrote: > On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 12:04 AM, Michael Glassford > wrote: > > Secondly: I'm sensitive to the extent that 'on delete cascade' et al > are phrased in SQL specific terms. I fully acknowledge the use case - > what happens to a FK when the object it

Re: HttpResponseStreaming, ticket #7581, and [soc2009/http-wsgi-improvements] Final(?) status update

2009-08-14 Thread ccahoon
I'm in agreement with Tai. Keeping them separate gives them consistent behavior for view authors to expect. "One thing I'm curious about here is the HTTP Content-Length header. It's late and I'm tired and cranky, so I may have missed it, but outside of the infrastructure for runserver I can't fin

overriding queryset for admin inlines

2009-08-14 Thread smcoll
Currently, we can override the queryset used by ModelAdmins. This is helpful, since often times the default manager omits instances that nevertheless belong in the admin. It seems to me that there's no way to override the queryset for inlines, though. Is that correct? Inlines seem to use the de

Re: HttpResponseStreaming, ticket #7581, and [soc2009/http-wsgi-improvements] Final(?) status update

2009-08-14 Thread Tai Lee
I think I prefer keeping HttpResponse and HttpResponseStreaming separate. Using the latter indicates explicitly that the user wants to send a streaming response and disable any middleware that doesn't explicitly support it. Using the former should always consume any content passed to it so that mi

Re: HttpResponseStreaming, ticket #7581, and [soc2009/http-wsgi-improvements] Final(?) status update

2009-08-14 Thread James Bennett
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 3:13 AM, ccahoon wrote: > One bit of advice I am looking for is what people's opinions are on > the use of isinstance versus hasattr to determine functionality. I am > personally partial to hasattr, because it covers subclasses, but I do > not know what the community tends

HttpResponseStreaming, ticket #7581, and [soc2009/http-wsgi-improvements] Final(?) status update

2009-08-14 Thread ccahoon
My last task before the GSoC hard pencils down date on Monday is an attempt at a solution to ticket #7581. The essential issue is that a lot of middleware requires access to the whole of HttpResponse.content, but this prevents streaming responses (to prevent timeouts). To allow for streaming resp