Hi Chris, Alex,
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 10:01 PM, Alex Gaynor wrote:
>
> On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 7:17 AM, chris
> wrote:
>>
>> I found this outdated post:
>> http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers/browse_thread/thread/d7ee84359d1c3ed7
>>
>> Because i was not able to add a message to it
On Mon, 2009-08-10 at 22:31 -0500, Jacob Kaplan-Moss wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 9:07 PM, Malcolm
> Tredinnick wrote:
> > The only that seems to be possibly *required* to be changed in Django to
> > support app-engine as a storage backend is the ManyToManyField change (I
> > say "possibly" be
On Tue, 2009-08-11 at 10:58 +0800, Russell Keith-Magee wrote:
[...]
> This one is slightly topical. Alex has a github branch that refactors
> the m2m code to get the SQL out of the related field model [1]. In
> order to do this, it introduces a dummy model for m2m fields. This is
> needed for Alex
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 9:07 PM, Malcolm
Tredinnick wrote:
> The only that seems to be possibly *required* to be changed in Django to
> support app-engine as a storage backend is the ManyToManyField change (I
> say "possibly" because I haven't thought around the issue much, so don't
> know if ther
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 10:07 AM, Malcolm
Tredinnick wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2009-08-10 at 05:19 -0700, Waldemar Kornewald wrote:
>> Hi,
>> now that 1.1 is out we can finally discuss App Engine support. Is
>> anyone planning to work on this feature or working on it for real or
>> are there just announc
On Mon, 2009-08-10 at 05:19 -0700, Waldemar Kornewald wrote:
> Hi,
> now that 1.1 is out we can finally discuss App Engine support. Is
> anyone planning to work on this feature or working on it for real or
> are there just announcements that someone might consider doing it?
>
> BTW, I've reworked
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 9:53 AM, Malcolm
Tredinnick wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2009-08-11 at 07:55 +0800, Russell Keith-Magee wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 10:56 PM, Alex Gaynor wrote:
>> >
>> > On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 7:19 AM, Waldemar Kornewald
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Hi,
>> >> now that 1.1 is out
On Tue, 2009-08-11 at 07:55 +0800, Russell Keith-Magee wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 10:56 PM, Alex Gaynor wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 7:19 AM, Waldemar Kornewald
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >> now that 1.1 is out we can finally discuss App Engine support. Is
> >> anyone planning to
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 10:56 PM, Alex Gaynor wrote:
>
> On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 7:19 AM, Waldemar Kornewald
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>> now that 1.1 is out we can finally discuss App Engine support. Is
>> anyone planning to work on this feature or working on it for real or
>> are there just announceme
2009/8/10 Filip Gruszczyński :
>
> Hi everyone!
>
> Putting asterisks after a required field is a common practice. To
> achieve I use right now a filter that is invoked after every form
> field in a template. This isn't very convenient, but I haven't found
> any better solution yet.
>
> I wonder i
This question belongs on django-users, not here. This list is for
discussion of the development of Django itself.
Karen
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django developers" group.
To post to this grou
I have a field:
revision = models.IntegerField(default=0)
on a model.
I assumed that if I set a default value for a field, I am free to
create an object that does not set 'revision', and save it.
However, this produces an IntegrityError:
IntegrityError: XXX.revision may not be NULL
When I check
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 7:17 AM, chris wrote:
>
> I found this outdated post:
> http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers/browse_thread/thread/d7ee84359d1c3ed7
>
> Because i was not able to add a message to it, i open this new post
> refering to the old one now.
>
> Are there any known furt
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 7:19 AM, Waldemar Kornewald wrote:
>
> Hi,
> now that 1.1 is out we can finally discuss App Engine support. Is
> anyone planning to work on this feature or working on it for real or
> are there just announcements that someone might consider doing it?
>
> BTW, I've reworked
Hi everyone!
Putting asterisks after a required field is a common practice. To
achieve I use right now a filter that is invoked after every form
field in a template. This isn't very convenient, but I haven't found
any better solution yet.
I wonder if something like this couldn't be added to Djan
I found this outdated post:
http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers/browse_thread/thread/d7ee84359d1c3ed7
Because i was not able to add a message to it, i open this new post
refering to the old one now.
Are there any known further developments on these filter
implementations mentioned i
Hi,
now that 1.1 is out we can finally discuss App Engine support. Is
anyone planning to work on this feature or working on it for real or
are there just announcements that someone might consider doing it?
BTW, I've reworked the mini-spec a little bit to improve id/key_name
handling. Here's the l
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 5:05 AM, Bala kumar wrote:
> Can anyone please suggest me a good open source python lib for
> generating PDF files from HTML file.
>
> Mainly I want to display an formatted table with some images..
This list, as has been advertised many, many times in the past, is not
the
Can anyone please suggest me a good open source python lib for
generating PDF files from HTML file.
Mainly I want to display an formatted table with some images..
Thanks,
Bala
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Googl
19 matches
Mail list logo
