Re: [GSOC] Altering the signature of Field.db_type and Field.get_db_prep_*

2009-07-31 Thread Russell Keith-Magee
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 8:34 AM, Jacob Kaplan-Moss wrote: > > Hi Alex, Russ -- > > I see some good pros and cons of each your suggestions. Just to throw > some more fuel on the fire, though, I've got an idea of my own: > > I tend to slightly favor introspection to identify old-style fields -- > it

Re: Ticket 10912: Autoescaping variable input in template tags

2009-07-31 Thread Malcolm Tredinnick
On Sat, 2009-08-01 at 12:17 +1000, Malcolm Tredinnick wrote: > Hi Andrew, > > On Fri, 2009-07-31 at 15:44 -0700, ab wrote: > > When a template tag takes a variable as input and renders its value > > (like the `cycle` or `firstof` tags), that value should respect the > > context's autoescape setti

Re: Ticket 10912: Autoescaping variable input in template tags

2009-07-31 Thread Malcolm Tredinnick
Hi Andrew, On Fri, 2009-07-31 at 15:44 -0700, ab wrote: > When a template tag takes a variable as input and renders its value > (like the `cycle` or `firstof` tags), that value should respect the > context's autoescape setting. Right now, the values are never escaped. > I'm proposing to make this

Ticket 10912: Autoescaping variable input in template tags

2009-07-31 Thread ab
When a template tag takes a variable as input and renders its value (like the `cycle` or `firstof` tags), that value should respect the context's autoescape setting. Right now, the values are never escaped. I'm proposing to make this change, and provide a unified way for people to implement their

[soc2009/http-wsgi-improvements] Status update

2009-07-31 Thread ccahoon
This week was mostly administrative and very small changes. I finished up 2131, 5241, 6527, 10190 pretty fully. Any further changes by the end of GSoC should be pretty small. I have pushed a couple tickets further back (particularly 9081 and related ideas), because they are not strictly necessary

Re: Regression test cases - foreign key updation problem

2009-07-31 Thread Karen Tracey
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 3:15 AM, Tarun Pasrija wrote: > > Hi > > While regressing the ibm_db_django adaptor to support Django 1.1, I > found the following behavior. Few of the regression test cases like > serializers, aggregation etc fail because of the following error:- > > The insert or update v

Regression test cases - foreign key updation problem

2009-07-31 Thread Tarun Pasrija
Hi While regressing the ibm_db_django adaptor to support Django 1.1, I found the following behavior. Few of the regression test cases like serializers, aggregation etc fail because of the following error:- The insert or update value of the FOREIGN KEY "DB2ADMIN.AGGREGATION_BOOK.SQL09073100270364