I didn't know this project, Andrew, thank you. This is a very generic
approach. Very nice.
I figure out that to keep working with class attributes, and keeping the
syntax clean, like I intended, there should be at least three fields
(AggregationField, MirrorField and another one for the 'render htm
Hi all,
Quick intro: I'm Daniel, a first year PhD student in Computer Science
at Purdue in good ol' Indiana (BS is also in Computer Science). I've
never contributed to the actual Django framework, but I've done some
amount of programming with Django and have subscribed to the mailing
lists/RSS fe
Hello, Alex!
> class Order(models.Model):
>>...
>>n_items = DenormalizedField(signal_from='itemorder',
>> qs=self.itemorder_set.count())
>>total_price = DenormalizedField(signal_from='itemorder',
>> qs=self.itemorder_set.sum('item_price'))
>>
>>
> I see a few problems, a) s
Alex Gaynor wrote:
>
>
> class Order(models.Model):
>...
>n_items = DenormalizedField(signal_from='itemorder',
> qs=self.itemorder_set.count())
>total_price = DenormalizedField(signal_from='itemorder',
> qs=self.itemorder_set.sum('item_price'))
>
>
>
On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 6:46 PM, Renato Garcia Pedigoni <
renatopedig...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> My name is Renato, 21, currently studying Biomedical Informatics at
> the University of São Paulo, Brazil. I'm submitting in the next week
> my proposal to GSoC, to create a denormalized mo
Hi folks,
My name is Renato, 21, currently studying Biomedical Informatics at
the University of São Paulo, Brazil. I'm submitting in the next week
my proposal to GSoC, to create a denormalized model field, like
discussed in
http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers/browse_thread/thread/9a
A Ruby developer has a blog post on that:
http://john.guen.in/svn/plugins/x_send_file/lib/
.
No compromises there,
:render => { :nothing => true }
(don't return anything in the content).
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed
On Sat, 2009-03-21 at 23:16 +0530, Madhusudan C.S wrote:
> Hi Malcolm and all,
>Doesn't ticket #5929 (http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/5929)
> look very similar to what I proposed for Python? Allowing Python
> built in complex datatype objects to be mapped to Relational
> Database (which i
On Sat, 2009-03-21 at 13:09 +0300, Ivan Sagalaev wrote:
> Hello everyone!
>
> Just played with new defer() and only() and noticed that fields deferred
> with only() aren't loaded when asked explicitly. I.e.:
>
> a = Article.objects.defer('text')[0]
> a.text # <-- does a new query as e
On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 2:25 PM, James Bennett wrote:
>
> On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 11:24 AM, Alex Gaynor
> wrote:
> > b) Having the admin be CSRF safe by default doesn't seam like a feature,
> it
> > feels like a bug, even if it's implementation gives everything a new
> > feature. That's just my
On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 11:24 AM, Alex Gaynor wrote:
> b) Having the admin be CSRF safe by default doesn't seam like a feature, it
> feels like a bug, even if it's implementation gives everything a new
> feature. That's just my thoughts though.
Personally I'd much rather have it actually *be* s
On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 1:45 PM, Eric Florenzano wrote:
>
> > To me replication is a major use-case. I suspect most people who move
> > beyond single server setup and beyond 10'000 - 20'000 visitors realize
> > that replication should just be in place ensuring performance and
> > redundancy. In m
... Hmm... good point, sorry, i'm a nub.
>
> Please file a ticket and upload a patch, docs changes go through the same
> process as any code bug.
>
> Alex
>
> --
> "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to
> say it." --Voltaire
> "The people's good is the highest
> Too late now since it's already committed, but I've got some serious
> reservations about this one. More development effort should have gone
> into improving and refactoring the middleware before it got
> automatically enabled.
I agree with James here. With apologies to Luke, the CSRF middlewa
On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 1:45 PM, Randy wrote:
>
> Just looking over the documentation for the release process and
> noticed a small word duplication:
>
> Index: release-process.txt
> ===
> --- release-process.txt (revision 10112)
> +
Just looking over the documentation for the release process and
noticed a small word duplication:
Index: release-process.txt
===
--- release-process.txt (revision 10112)
+++ release-process.txt (working copy)
@@ -108,7 +108,7 @@
Hi Malcolm and all,
Doesn't ticket #5929 (http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/5929)
look very similar to what I proposed for Python? Allowing Python
built in complex datatype objects to be mapped to Relational
Database (which includes lists, dictionaries and tuples)? May
be an additional abstra
> To me replication is a major use-case. I suspect most people who move
> beyond single server setup and beyond 10'000 - 20'000 visitors realize
> that replication should just be in place ensuring performance and
> redundancy. In my experience other multi-DB patterns (those that covered
> with `us
On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 12:20 PM, Luke Plant wrote:
>
> Hi Adrian,
>
> On Saturday 21 March 2009 01:47:08 Adrian Holovaty wrote:
>
> > I've been traveling since Tuesday, and, shall we say, I'm not that
> > excited about this being in the default middleware. In fact, I'm +1
> > for reverting this
Hi Adrian,
On Saturday 21 March 2009 01:47:08 Adrian Holovaty wrote:
> I've been traveling since Tuesday, and, shall we say, I'm not that
> excited about this being in the default middleware. In fact, I'm +1
> for reverting this change and might even want to exercise the
> benevolent dictator ve
Hey,
Checkout www.RemindMeSam.com .
--
Amit Upadhyay
Via - www.remindmesam.com
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-developers@g
Alex Gaynor wrote:
> 8) Time permitting implement a few common replication patterns.
I'm kind of not very excited with this point.
To me replication is a major use-case. I suspect most people who move
beyond single server setup and beyond 10'000 - 20'000 visitors realize
that replication shoul
Hello everyone!
Just played with new defer() and only() and noticed that fields deferred
with only() aren't loaded when asked explicitly. I.e.:
a = Article.objects.defer('text')[0]
a.text # <-- does a new query as expected
a = Article.objects.only('date')[0]
a.text # <-- do
23 matches
Mail list logo
