Re: Interaction of annotate() and values()

On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 3:12 PM, Karen Tracey wrote: > On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 1:56 AM, Russell Keith-Magee > wrote: >> >> So - some options: >> >> 1) Leave things as-is. Annotated columns always appear in the result >> set. This is inconsistent with extra(), and means you can't use >> annotated q

Re: Interaction of annotate() and values()

On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 1:56 AM, Russell Keith-Magee wrote: > So - some options: > > 1) Leave things as-is. Annotated columns always appear in the result > set. This is inconsistent with extra(), and means you can't use > annotated queries in __in clauses. > > 2) Modify things slightly - annotate()

Re: Option to disable messages in auth context processor

On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 9:07 AM, Jacob Kaplan-Moss wrote: > On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 9:01 AM, Vinicius Mendes wrote: >> So I decided to write a new messages app and it works very well, the only >> problem is the django.core.context_processors.auth. > > Yeah, this processor has a bunch of bugs in it

Re: Custom FilterSpecs #5833 planned for Django 1.1?

On Feb 8, 2:15 pm, Karen Tracey wrote: > I don't have time to devote to this right now, but I'd suggest taking a look > at the svn history of  the tests that check for the ?e=1 redirect.  I have a > vague recollection that it/they may be there as a result of a problem where > incorrect lookup par

Re: #9344 and policy for small bug reports

I just want to register a similar issue. Had opened a ticket, #10057, with patch on a trivial matter as http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/10057. Haven't found even any comments regarding its feasibility etc. Can't figure out whether people are engaged for some milestone coming but this seems to

Re: Custom FilterSpecs #5833 planned for Django 1.1?

On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 10:28 AM, Ben Gerdemann wrote: > > On Feb 7, 12:35 pm, Alex Gaynor wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 7, 2009 at 8:27 AM, Ben Gerdemann wrote: > > > > A couple things, first the patch still has a pair of TODO comments, so > > either those comments are no longer applicable, or what th

Re: Custom FilterSpecs #5833 planned for Django 1.1?

On Feb 7, 12:35 pm, Alex Gaynor wrote: > On Sat, Feb 7, 2009 at 8:27 AM, Ben Gerdemann wrote: > > A couple things, first the patch still has a pair of TODO comments, so > either those comments are no longer applicable, or what they refer to should > be fixed.  Secondly, it needs docs and tests.