After several discussions with Honza, we are still on somewhat
different positions what the validator function signature should
be and how core validators should access the fields of a form or
a model instance.
In core validators, no special case handling of forms and models
is needed even in mul
On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 1:16 PM, koenb wrote:
>
> In ticket #10113 I signalled two problems. The first was almost
> immediately fixed by Russel (thanks!). For the second problem I added
> a specific testcase that was giving me wrong results. It concerns an
> annotated query with ordering on a for
On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 6:16 PM, Jeremy Dunck wrote:
> I'd like to do some processing any time a flatpage is requested.
>
> I can accomplish this by using a view middleware and testing for the
> resolved view, but it seems a like a signal would be useful so I could
> have a reference to the flatp
In ticket #10113 I signalled two problems. The first was almost
immediately fixed by Russel (thanks!). For the second problem I added
a specific testcase that was giving me wrong results. It concerns an
annotated query with ordering on a foreign key that was not yet
included in the query. Russel r
Sorry about that.
Do you think such a library, once stable, could make it to the trunk?
Regards,
Denis
On Jan 23, 10:51 pm, Malcolm Tredinnick
wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-01-23 at 15:08 -0800, nside wrote:
> > Hello,
>
> > I just started a new project that basically allows you to write email
> > hand
Oops, sorry. I meant form's meta.
Something like this:
class GroupForm(ModelForm):
class Meta:
model = Group
m2m_model = User
Looks like more logical thing, than I suggested at the beginning.
On Jan 24, 6:53 am, Malcolm Tredinnick
wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-01-23 at 00:12 -0800,
