On Wed, 2009-01-14 at 05:17 +0100, Vladimir Prudnikov wrote:
[...]
> First of all RSS file is XML Document. From RSS specification -
> "RSS is a dialect of XML. All RSS files !must conform to the XML 1.0
> specification, as published on the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C)
> website."
That is
On 14 Jan 2009, at 04:55, Malcolm Tredinnick wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2009-01-14 at 04:39 +0100, Vladimir Prudnikov wrote:
>> My siggestion is about feed framework. When you add description to
>> the
>> feed item like
>>
>> feed.add_item(
>> title=pic.name,
>> link=li
On Wed, 2009-01-14 at 04:39 +0100, Vladimir Prudnikov wrote:
> My siggestion is about feed framework. When you add description to the
> feed item like
>
> feed.add_item(
> title=pic.name,
> link=link,
> description=description
> )
>
> th
Hi all,
I have now finished work on ticket #3566 - adding aggregations to Django's ORM.
I intend to commit the code to Django's trunk tomorrow evening, my
time (i.e., in about 30 hours time).
If you have any objections or problem reports, speak now or live with
the consequences :-)
Yours,
Russ
My siggestion is about feed framework. When you add description to the
feed item like
feed.add_item(
title=pic.name,
link=link,
description=description
)
the html content inside description tag will be htmlencoded (< and >
will be repl
Just to clarify -- the failure I hit in the Django test suite after
re-ordering rolled back test cases to run first is not one where a test
assumes another runs before it (rather the reverse) or one that can be
triggered currently by just running that single test in isolation. If you
run just file
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 8:29 PM, Russell Keith-Magee wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 7:38 AM, Karen Tracey wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 12:06 PM, Jacob Kaplan-Moss
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 10:00 AM, Karen Tracey
> wrote:
> >> > OK, so that sounds like one vote for
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 7:38 AM, Karen Tracey wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 12:06 PM, Jacob Kaplan-Moss
> wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 10:00 AM, Karen Tracey wrote:
>> > OK, so that sounds like one vote for leaving things as they are for
>> > doctests, that is with no rolled-back tra
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 12:06 PM, Jacob Kaplan-Moss <
jacob.kaplanm...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 10:00 AM, Karen Tracey wrote:
> > OK, so that sounds like one vote for leaving things as they are for
> > doctests, that is with no rolled-back transaction cleaning up after them.
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 1:00 AM, Karen Tracey wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 9:05 AM, Russell Keith-Magee
> wrote:
>>
>> > So, the latest patch on #8183 (8138alternate-nodoctestxaction.diff) does
>> > not
>> > enclose doctest runs in a rolled-back transaction. Thus the effects of
>> > doctest
Hola, Gracias por responder, voy a analizar bien el codigo y
modificarlo para el mio, si tengo duda te posteo otro por aqui
Muchas gracias
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django developers" group.
To
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 3:04 PM, Ivan Sagalaev
wrote:
>
> Alex Gaynor wrote:
> > Probably stupid question
>
> Which it was :-). I didn't realize that it's doctests.
>
> > you need to replace it with
> > >>> Decimal("3.0") == Decimal('3.0')
> > True
>
> So why not?
>
> >
>
If you look at the s
Alex Gaynor wrote:
> Probably stupid question
Which it was :-). I didn't realize that it's doctests.
> you need to replace it with
> >>> Decimal("3.0") == Decimal('3.0')
> True
So why not?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subs
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 2:59 PM, Ivan Sagalaev
wrote:
>
> Russell Keith-Magee wrote:
> > Expected:
> >[('id', 2), ('isbn', u'067232959'), ('manufacture_cost',
> > ...11.545...), ('mean_auth_age', 45.0), ('name', u'Sams Teach Yourself
> > Django in 24 Hours'), ('pages', 528), ('price', Decimal(
Russell Keith-Magee wrote:
> Expected:
>[('id', 2), ('isbn', u'067232959'), ('manufacture_cost',
> ...11.545...), ('mean_auth_age', 45.0), ('name', u'Sams Teach Yourself
> Django in 24 Hours'), ('pages', 528), ('price', Decimal("23.09")),
> ('pubdate', datetime.date(2008, 3, 3)), ('publisher_i
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 10:00 AM, Karen Tracey wrote:
> OK, so that sounds like one vote for leaving things as they are for
> doctests, that is with no rolled-back transaction cleaning up after them.
Yeah, I agree. doctests are the 80% testing tool; if you need more
control, that's what formal t
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 9:05 AM, Russell Keith-Magee wrote:
>
> > So, the latest patch on #8183 (8138alternate-nodoctestxaction.diff) does
> not
> > enclose doctest runs in a rolled-back transaction. Thus the effects of
> > doctests can still bleed over into subsequent tests. This doesn't
> act
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 4:59 AM, Karen Tracey wrote:
> One of the item on the list for 1.1 is "Run Django test cases inside a
> transaction". The ticket for this is #8138:
Thanks for picking up on this one, Karen. I thought I would have time
to look at this, but life conspired against me.
> So
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 8:30 AM, Jeremy Dunck wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 6:45 AM, Alex Gaynor
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 7:40 AM, Russell Keith-Magee
> > wrote:
>
> >> Can anyone shed any light on the workaround for this? Is the only
> >> solution to rewrite the t
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 6:45 AM, Alex Gaynor wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 7:40 AM, Russell Keith-Magee
> wrote:
>> Can anyone shed any light on the workaround for this? Is the only
>> solution to rewrite the test so that it doesn't depend on the output
>> format of __repr__?
>>
>> Y
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 7:40 AM, Russell Keith-Magee wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I'm was just about ready to commit ticket #3566, but then Justin Bronn
> threw a spanner in my works :-)
>
> Justin pointed out a number of test failures that stem from the change
> in Decimal.__repr__() to use single quo
Hi all,
I'm was just about ready to commit ticket #3566, but then Justin Bronn
threw a spanner in my works :-)
Justin pointed out a number of test failures that stem from the change
in Decimal.__repr__() to use single quotes rather than double quotes
in Python 2.6. The problems present like this
22 matches
Mail list logo
