On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 9:24 PM, Christopher Allan Webber
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> So, by now the primary problem with Django is not the lack of good
> applications. There are tons of good applications. The primary problem
> is that almost none of them work together. There are a few reason
Well technically it could be done in a backwards compatible way with
some clever introspection.
Alex
On Dec 9, 5:55 pm, "Russell Keith-Magee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 11:44 PM, Thomas Guettler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/3896
>
On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 11:44 PM, Thomas Guettler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/3896
>
> The initial question of this ticket was:
>
> Why is value not passed to the clean_%s function?
>
> Although the ticket is closed, this has not changed.
>
> I think clean
Over the past few days I've been putting together an implementation of
ticket 23[1]. I realise this isn't on the 1.1 features list, but I'd
still like to solicit any thoughts people have. Right now the API is
that in any form validation method you can using the warning system,
it works by:
from
/me rereads this email...
Alright, the content of what I'm saying I still agree with. The wording
was a bit harsh... I literally wrote this during insomnia with a 101
degree fever at 6:00AM. It was supposed to be funny, not mean.
I still think we should adjust that documentation, but if it off
http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/3896
The initial question of this ticket was:
Why is value not passed to the clean_%s function?
Although the ticket is closed, this has not changed.
I think clean methods should look like this:
{{{
def clean_foo(self, value):
...
}}}
Up to now, you
So, by now the primary problem with Django is not the lack of good
applications. There are tons of good applications. The primary problem
is that almost none of them work together. There are a few reasons for
this... some of it has to do with templating, some of it has to do with
people not usi