On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 3:50 PM, David Cramer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok with all of that being said. I've checked the ticket (once again),
> and there doesn't seem to be any API proposed for fields as include-
> only.
>From the ticket description:
> We should also provide the inverse of hi
Ok with all of that being said. I've checked the ticket (once again),
and there doesn't seem to be any API proposed for fields as include-
only. Is there another ticket other than #5420?
On Nov 21, 7:15 pm, Malcolm Tredinnick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-11-21 at 12:53 -0800, David C
