On Thu, 2008-10-09 at 14:13 -0700, DaveV wrote:
> Ahh - never mind - I misread the first post.
>
> Still, it would seem helpful if PUT data was processed in a way that
> was more readily accessible, such as a PUT dictionary like the POST or
> GET ones.
No, because it would be almost always wron
Ahh - never mind - I misread the first post.
Still, it would seem helpful if PUT data was processed in a way that
was more readily accessible, such as a PUT dictionary like the POST or
GET ones.
On Oct 9, 2:09 pm, DaveV <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Aug 20, 6:13 am, Malcolm Tredinnick <[EMAIL
On Aug 20, 6:13 am, Malcolm Tredinnick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-08-20 at 02:29 -0700, zvoase wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > What I'm doing now is changing the method to POST, accessing the
> > request.raw_post_data attribute, and then changing the method back to
> > PUT. This seems a li
Hi,
I am working on this, I have everything planned and designed based on
my talk with Jacob and Malcolm during DjangoCon. I should have
something ready within a few weeks, will post a patch to the ticket
page.
Thanks for the support
Honza
On Sep 25, 12:35 pm, mrts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
Hi Devs,
At DjangoCon it was mentioned that you were working on a process for
nominating or approving 3rd party Django apps to be pulled in as
official contrib apps. I'm curious if that's been worked out yet.
Thanks,
Rob
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this me
Howdy folks --
It's that time of year again: PyCon 2009 is accepting proposals for
talks and tutorials. PyCon 2009 will be held in Chicago, Illinois from
March 27 - 29; there will be two tutorial days before and four
development sprint days after.
PyCon has special meaning to Django: we first de
