Re: Search facility for new documentation

2008-08-30 Thread Ronny Haryanto
On Sun, Aug 31, 2008 at 12:22 AM, Fraser Nevett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The new documentation site is great, but is currently lacking a search > facility. If you do 'make html' in the docs directory you'll get a search facility provided by sphinx. It's just that the resulting links are missi

Re: FormPreview documentation typos

2008-08-30 Thread Rodolfo
Thanks! I've done that and it worked nicely. Rodolfo On 31 ago, 00:46, "Karen Tracey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 11:33 PM, Rodolfo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I tried creating a new ticket on Trac, but it didn't like me, and I > > didn't like the idea of creating

Re: FormPreview documentation typos

2008-08-30 Thread Karen Tracey
On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 11:33 PM, Rodolfo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I tried creating a new ticket on Trac, but it didn't like me, and I > didn't like the idea of creating "just another login account" just for > that. > You don't have to create a login account. If you just fill in something

FormPreview documentation typos

2008-08-30 Thread Rodolfo
I tried creating a new ticket on Trac, but it didn't like me, and I didn't like the idea of creating "just another login account" just for that. Here is what I caught reading the docs on http://www.djangoproject.com/documentation/form_preview/ --- On "How to use FormPreview

Re: Search facility for new documentation

2008-08-30 Thread Ramiro Morales
On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 6:52 PM, julianb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On this occasion, why not change "New in Django development version" > remarks to "New in this version"? That makes much more sense, since > the docs get frozen for each version, so you know now and later this > was new in dev/

Re: Search facility for new documentation

2008-08-30 Thread julianb
On Aug 30, 9:31 pm, "Jacob Kaplan-Moss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The latest docs will always be at //dev/; versions frozen with > each release will be at ///. On this occasion, why not change "New in Django development version" remarks to "New in this version"? That makes much more sense, sin

Re: Search facility for new documentation

2008-08-30 Thread Jacob Kaplan-Moss
Please keep in mind the the new docs are a sort of preview release -- you'll note we've not announced 'em in any official manner -- and so are rough around the edges. Please be patient -- I'll be cleaning these things up by the time we push 1.0. On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 12:22 PM, Fraser Nevett <[E

import error during the init phase

2008-08-30 Thread Mikael Moutakis
Hi I encountered 2 new problems when updating to version 1.0-beta_2-SVN-8714. I have two applications, "kousaiconreg" and "kousaimembershipfile". The model.py in the "kousaiconreg" app imports the class "Member" from the model of the "kousaimembership" app. I discovered that I got an ImportError

Search facility for new documentation

2008-08-30 Thread Fraser Nevett
The new documentation site is great, but is currently lacking a search facility. I've been working on adding an embedded Google Custom Search, which is nearly ready and working well on my local copy. I'll submit a patch for this to Trac shortly, but it would really help if someone who knows about

Re: A (last-minute) compromise on {% url %}

2008-08-30 Thread daonb
+1 for a sweet feature. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to

Re: Working on comments

2008-08-30 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Aug 30, 1:40 am, "Bruce Kroeze" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm mostly through with a drop-in replacement for the old comments, using > the new Comment system and signals.  It should be slick. > > When it tests out, I'll also commit the new save() parameters mentioned in > the backwards-incomp

Re: Does CharField still required max_length? Or is it a bug?

2008-08-30 Thread Karen Tracey
On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 12:56 AM, M N Islam Shihan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > Yes, it has been made optional with this syntax class CharField(* > max_length=None*[, ***options*]) > This is true for all other model fields as well that were expecting > max_length parameter. > I don't believe this

Re: Does CharField still required max_length? Or is it a bug?

2008-08-30 Thread M N Islam Shihan
Yes, it has been made optional with this syntax class CharField(* max_length=None*[, ***options*]) This is true for all other model fields as well that were expecting max_length parameter. Regards, Shihan On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 10:49 AM, guoqiang qian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > hi,all > > I u