Ludvig Ericson wrote on 07/22/08 22:45:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Jul 22, 2008, at 16:40, Jeremy Dunck wrote:
>> In general, expect DNS hiccups for a while; the whole world is
>> patching right now.
>
> Off-topic, yes, but I have to ask, what do you mean?
Guess he
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 5:29 PM, Sean Legassick
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 22 Jul 2008, at 17:13, Leo Soto M. wrote:
> >
> > > Anything I can do to help? (I do a lot of development with the gis
> > > branch and PostGIS so I can try out the patch there and see what
> > > happens).
> >
> > That
On Tue, 2008-07-22 at 17:05 +0200, Michael Radziej wrote:
> Hi,
>
> before I create chaos - is it right to use this milestone for everything
> that can not go into 1.0 (like any feature requests that are not on the
> list)?
There are about a 1000 tickets in Trac. It would be a shame if every
si
Oh, I thought it was just a bad joke about how the server would be
getting a ton of load since the alpha was just released :/
On Jul 22, 3:55 pm, Fredrik Lundh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ludvig Ericson wrote:
> >> In general, expect DNS hiccups for a while; the whole world is
> >> patching righ
Sorry if a made a mistake,
but i reopened #7666 for a reason mentioned in the ticket (i hope i
stepped on no ones toes by doing that)
the comment reads as follows
"""
this change, effectively kills "get" overloading in Managers
i can think of a million reasons way this is necessary,
caching th
Ludvig Ericson wrote:
>> In general, expect DNS hiccups for a while; the whole world is
>> patching right now.
>
> Off-topic, yes, but I have to ask, what do you mean?
the Kaminsky bug, perhaps?
http://www.doxpara.com/
which is a rumored to be a naughty little DNS poisoning attack that's
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Jul 22, 2008, at 16:40, Jeremy Dunck wrote:
> In general, expect DNS hiccups for a while; the whole world is
> patching right now.
Off-topic, yes, but I have to ask, what do you mean?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin)
i
On Tue, 2008-07-22 at 11:37 -0700, jedie wrote:
> There exist the gread wiki page:
> http://code.djangoproject.com/wiki/BackwardsIncompatibleChanges
> I think it would be nice if there is the same list for Backwards-
> compatible changes, too.
>
> Sometimes i find some parte in the documentatio
There exist the gread wiki page:
http://code.djangoproject.com/wiki/BackwardsIncompatibleChanges
I think it would be nice if there is the same list for Backwards-
compatible changes, too.
Sometimes i find some parte in the documentation and wonder, woops
this must be new.
OK, on the main Documen
Since it seems like Django is gearing up for a 1.0 release soon, I
think the reopened ticket#7593 should be addressed. Right now, there
is no standard way to access an UploadedFile as a python file object.
Suppose you have a form and want to process a zip file, for example.
You'd want to unit te
David,
On Tue, 2008-07-22 at 01:51 -0500, David Cramer wrote:
> Sorry, to be more clear, that is an *exact* match on what is in the
> database, but using the BINARY form does not return the result.
Please open a ticket for this so it doesn't get forgotten. You'll
somehow have to manage the mail
With 1.0 alpha upon us, I thought it would be a good time for an announcement.
On August 1st, just under two weeks from now, we will be hosting a
sprint in Washington, DC. The focus will be on Django 1.0 beta 1.
This marks the first east-coast Django sprint (I think), so we're
trying to bring t
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 12:01 PM, Sean Legassick
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On 22 Jul 2008, at 15:01, Leo Soto M. wrote:
>
>> I'm not going to pretend that I know why there is not
>> TimeField.to_python. But some changes on #7560 needed it, so it is
>> implemented on its attached patch.
>
>
On 22 Jul 2008, at 15:01, Leo Soto M. wrote:
> I'm not going to pretend that I know why there is not
> TimeField.to_python. But some changes on #7560 needed it, so it is
> implemented on its attached patch.
Ah yes, so it is.
Anything I can do to help? (I do a lot of development with the gis
Hi all,
Appologies for being a couple of weeks late with this... I'm currently
working for in a team developing a django site and we'd like to offer our
facilities (office space, wireless, tea making etc..) to hold a sprint in
Oxford, UK. I've noticed that there are a few people/companies using dj
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 9:10 AM, Michael Radziej <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> the djangoproject.com domain does currently not work, even when you ask the
>> ns*.mediatemple.net directly, at least from Germany. Probably simply a
>> problem with their name servers.
>
> Ah, it is back. Sorry for the
On Tue, Jul 22, Michael Radziej wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> the djangoproject.com domain does currently not work, even when you ask the
> ns*.mediatemple.net directly, at least from Germany. Probably simply a
> problem with their name servers.
Ah, it is back. Sorry for the noise.
Michael
--
noris ne
This should have been more obvious to me in the first place. The
problem only exists for an empty string value (the choices in my
particular case hat string keys, and the field was not nullable).
Tries this case:
>>> w = Whiz(c='')
>>> w.save()
>>> w.get_c_display()
u''
Expected:
u''
Got:
Previously, get_FIELD_display(), for a blank or unknown value of
FIELD, return the value unchanged, e.g. say None or an empty string.
After the change, it returns the automatically inserted blank choice
(---). This is due to it now using field.flatchoices, which is
dynamically generated throu
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 4:40 PM, Jason Davies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Anyone? Where's SmileyChris! :-)
If you've been paying attention, you may have noticed that the core
developers have been a little busy over the last week or so, pushing
1.0 alpha out the door.
I apologize for the fac
Hi all,
I'm a complete Django noob, but I've reached the same conclusions,
namely:
1. Django is really wonderful!
2. I need an ordered ManyToMany relationship :-)
(long story short: my project involves photos and galleries; the
photos can belong to multiple galleries with a potentially different
That's cool!
We don't really have any dates in mind yet... it would seem to make sense to
do it on one of those dates - especially if there aren't any committers
available in Oxford.
These are the date's left:
August 1 Push to beta sprint in Washington, DC and in IRC. August 5 *1.0
beta 1.* Augus
Damn gmail, I wasn't ready to send that!!! What I was also going to say is
that time is relatively flexible, so if anyone who is interested could get
in touch we could talk about possible dates. I don't know if there are any
committers in the Oxford area who might be available, but that would
obvio
Anyone? Where's SmileyChris! :-)
Thanks,
Jason
On Jul 12, 4:00 am, Jason Davies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I recently attached an updated patch to #6213, "PREPEND_WWW and
> APPEND_SLASH settings don't work with flatpages middleware". The
> patch now contains unit tests demonstra
Thanks Malcolm and my apologies for posting it here.
On Jul 21, 11:49 pm, Malcolm Tredinnick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-07-21 at 08:13 -0700,madhavwrote:
> > Hello guys, I am just confused with a fundamental db problem. I have
> > table which has got 48 lakh rows(each row has got 8
Guys, I need some middleware or utility to check how many postgresql
connections are actually used to generate a particular page in django.
Can We get that by any chance? I am in the real pinch, Please help me.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because
26 matches
Mail list logo
