Jacob Kaplan-Moss wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 3:51 PM, Gary Wilson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> a. I am thinking that we should instead keep the ``model`` argument,
>> but make it optional. Then, we ensure that one of ``model`` or
>> ``form_class`` is given. ``form_class``, if given,
Hey, I *think* this is the right place to post this, but I could be
wrong.
Is there a possibility to have a copy of the mailing list on
code.djangoproject.com? The thing is, I've found myself wonting to ref
django-developers on a number of occasions, and I usually just add a
link to group
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Jun 19, 2008, at 08:32, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I'll go ahead and add http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/5957 to the
> list of DDN tickets that could use a resolution pre-1.0, IMO this
> ticket should be pretty noncontroversial and is a clear
I like it. I've run into a few cases recently where I just needed a
simple_tag with access to the context.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django developers" group.
To post to this group, send email
Désole !
On 22 juin, 10:39, "Russell Keith-Magee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 2:31 PM, MickaelC <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> > It is a method to add tables to a model without having to manually
> > launch the syncdb command in a shell?
>
> 1) django-developers i
