On 03-Jun-08, at 9:32 PM, The Code Janitor wrote:
> (debugging isn't great, I can't figure out how to do dynamic debugging
> on Django operations, and code development features such as dynamic
> lookups, refactoring and unit testing are painful at best).
the whole idea of shifting to python fro
I'v never been happy with full blown IDE's like Eclipse, far too slow
for my liking.
I use Geany, they call it a 'lightweight' IDE, but don't let that
deceive you, Geany actually has a lot of useful features. The Linux
version has an integrated terminal (VTE), and together with Geany's
project m
On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 2:58 PM, Joe Bowman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Should I just create it and
> tell people to copy it into the directory with the default cache
> backends? That appears the only way to insert a new one, but I'm so
> new to Django I thought I should ask first and see if
Hello,
I'm sure you've seen your share of new Django/Python developers come
by this group since the prerelease of Google Appengine, and I'm yet
another one. I'm trying to determine what the best way to add a cache
backend to Django might be? Preferably I'd like to do it in a way so
that it's easy
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 8:53 AM, Russell Keith-Magee
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jun 1, 2008 at 9:04 PM, Nicolas Lara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> I dont mind changing it to indexes. To me it is more readable with the
>> list copying/slicing. I might do a bit of profiling for that to
The Code Janitor wrote:
> Although it is a lot smarter about python development I am wondering
> if there is a better alternative.
>
This list is for discussion of the development *of* django, not with it
(or python in general, for that matter). The django-users group is a
much better forum
Not to start a flame war. But, having done many years of enterprise
java work I am not happy with Eclipse and PyDev for python development
(debugging isn't great, I can't figure out how to do dynamic debugging
on Django operations, and code development features such as dynamic
lookups, refactoring
Can you suggest any documentation I should read that describes how
FastCGI handles PIPES and file channels.
I thought something like that was happening but, if that was the case
wouldn't the output to stderr and stdout end up in the rendered pages
(like they do for php pages). I have poked and pr
I already figured it out, by following the Django source I came up
with something like this to solve the problem:
def formfield_for_dbfield(self, db_field, **kwargs):
if db_field.name == 'sites':
kwargs['initial'] = Site.objects.filter(pk=settings.SITE_ID)
return s
Hi,
Do you think intcomma should use localized separator? If so, would
still be 'intcomma' a correct name (after all, it wouldn't use commas
in, for example, Italian)?
I already wrote a patch which gives intcomma an optional argument. But
I don't know if I should submit a ticket about intcomma
I wonder if it would be a good idea to put the comment config (e.g.,
threaded or not, maximum length, pre-/post-moderation, etc) into a
separate model, then let all models needing a comment have a foreign key
to the comment config model.
Zhiwu
Thejaswi Puthraya wrote:
> Hello folks,
> My ex
On Jun 2, 7:12 am, The Code Janitor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The problem is that I am loosing [sic] stdout and stderr.
Yes, that's how most FastCGI spawners work. They close all file
descriptors, and open a new socket, then duplicate that socket's FD
onto a constant known as FCGI_LISTENSOCK_F
On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 6:49 PM, Antonis Christofides
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi, I'm first-time poster in this list,
>
> http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/6994 is a minor security issue
> that I submitted with a patch. It's not so much that I want this
> particular patch to be reviewed a
Hi, I'm first-time poster in this list,
http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/6994 is a minor security issue
that I submitted with a patch. It's not so much that I want this
particular patch to be reviewed and checked in, but that I can't
figure out the development process.
Specifically, there is
14 matches
Mail list logo
