On Wed, 2008-04-23 at 21:24 -0700, PJ wrote:
>
> .archive_index templates get 'latest' ; all the others get
> 'object_list'
> If template_object_name is set to 'foo',
>
> .archive_index templates get 'foo'; all the others get 'foo_list'
You can pass in template_object_name='foo_list' to archi
.archive_index templates get 'latest' ; all the others get
'object_list'
If template_object_name is set to 'foo',
.archive_index templates get 'foo'; all the others get 'foo_list'
.archive_index and .archive_year templates get a 'date_list'; why
don't .archive_month and .archive_day ?
This al
I don't know if this should go to devs or users but I wanted to ask...
Now that queryset-refactor has implemented model inheritance (and will
soon be in trunk), will the recommended way to tie in new columns to
contrib.auth.models.User change? For example, if we want to add in
profile informatio
On Wed, 2008-04-23 at 16:35 -0700, mtrier wrote:
> This is a small thing but I was encouraged to mention it since we
> still have an opportunity to make the change before Queryset Refactor
> gets merged. It seems to me that values_list would be more consistent
> with things like select_related o
This is a small thing but I was encouraged to mention it since we
still have an opportunity to make the change before Queryset Refactor
gets merged. It seems to me that values_list would be more consistent
with things like select_related or order_by. Yeah, it's a small
thing, but what the heck.
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 10:44 PM, Antares <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello,
> I'm developing a custom admin zone named eadmin, and I hope one day
> becomes good enough to be part of django. I'm not sure if this group
> is the right place, or maybe I should post into django-users. As I'm
>
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 6:58 AM, Malcolm Tredinnick
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
Thanks for answers to the questions Malcolm!
> > I don't have a lot of time to
> > spend (and I'm sure that's true of many folks working on Django), but
> > when I do spend it, I want to make sure it's getti
That would be a good first step - Clearly defining what 1.0 means and
how do we know we got there when we get there.
and defining roadmap from current pre-beta stage to 1.0.
what is there on wiki currently is outdated and not well thought of
and not clear.
Thanks Malcom for taking the lead.
tha
On Wed, 2008-04-23 at 07:50 -0700, Eratothene wrote:
> It looks that API lacks support for SQL HAVING clause, this one should
> be distinct from filter, GROUP BY without HAVING is often useless.
>
> Consider adding it to api (something like
> Model.objects.aggregate(height__sum).having(sex='M'))
It looks that API lacks support for SQL HAVING clause, this one should
be distinct from filter, GROUP BY without HAVING is often useless.
Consider adding it to api (something like
Model.objects.aggregate(height__sum).having(sex='M'))
Also do not forget to add HAVING clause to .extra() method.
Hello,
I'm developing a custom admin zone named eadmin, and I hope one day
becomes good enough to be part of django. I'm not sure if this group
is the right place, or maybe I should post into django-users. As I'm
developing using django core features I think this is the right place.
I have a form
this is third time this post has come - is it me or something else?
On 23-Apr-08, at 4:28 PM, Malcolm Tredinnick wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 2008-04-23 at 03:40 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> On Apr 16, 7:56 pm, "Justin Lilly" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> We have one. Its called 1.0 and the more
On Wed, 2008-04-23 at 03:40 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Apr 16, 7:56 pm, "Justin Lilly" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > We have one. Its called 1.0 and the more you contribute, the closer you get
> > ;)
>
> No offense, but where is that milestone documented? Adrian chimed in
> with what
On Apr 16, 7:56 pm, "Justin Lilly" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We have one. Its called 1.0 and the more you contribute, the closer you get
> ;)
No offense, but where is that milestone documented? Adrian chimed in
with what he thinks is left for a 1.0 beta, but I can't find anything
on the site
14 matches
Mail list logo
