Re: Feature Request: "Abstract Model"

Thanks for your notices Wahrong. 1. by "syncdb.py" you do mean "manage.py syncdb", don't you? Thanks for spotting, the table was not created anyway in fact (only the confusing message was generated), but I corrected django/core/ management/commands/syncdb.py and will upload the latest patch soon.

Mee Sex

http://www.ziddu.com/gallery.php?uid=Z6%2BhnZanaK2fluKnZqqhkZSmY6uhnZWs6 _ ตกแต่งรูปของคุณได้เหมือนมืออาชีพด้วย Photo Gallery http://www.get.live.com/wl/all --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this

How I changed my mobile into cash?

Join US and get, Latest offerings on your fingertips. Information of the latest product in tune with your interest. Up-to-date news on upcoming gizmos and gadgets. Check them at your leisure. On top of it all, effortlessly get paid for such kind of information. Plus, get a free guide on how to

Re: i18n missing feature ... continued (proposed solution for the upcoming sprint)

hi guys, is there some kind of follow up to this topic or is it simply dead? wolfram On Nov 26, 2007 11:58 AM, Wolfram Kriesing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I would like to allow the following too: > > {% blocktrans %} >Received on {{ message.created|date as date }} > ... > > this removes t