Why couldn't both coexist, but be mutually exclusive?
{% load firstapp.library as mylib %}
{% load thislib thatlib theotherlib %}
The only thing that would prevent is the use of a library named "as" loaded
in the second position, not a big deal. After all, we are already using
"as" all over the
On Oct 22, 8:50 am, "Andrew Durdin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10/21/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Selfishly I would like to be able to do:
> > {% load firstapp.library as mylib %}
> > {{ context_var|mylib.myfilter }}
>
> I don't think this would play nicely wit
On Mon, 2007-10-22 at 19:53 -0600, Ian Kelly wrote:
> On 10/22/07, Malcolm Tredinnick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Matt,
> >
> > On Mon, 2007-10-22 at 15:04 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > Author: mboersma
> > > Date: 2007-10-22 17:04:00 -0500 (Mon, 22 Oct 2007)
> > > New Revision:
On 10/22/07, Malcolm Tredinnick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi Matt,
>
> On Mon, 2007-10-22 at 15:04 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Author: mboersma
> > Date: 2007-10-22 17:04:00 -0500 (Mon, 22 Oct 2007)
> > New Revision: 6595
> >
> > Modified:
> >django/trunk/tests/regressiontests/for
Hi Matt,
On Mon, 2007-10-22 at 15:04 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Author: mboersma
> Date: 2007-10-22 17:04:00 -0500 (Mon, 22 Oct 2007)
> New Revision: 6595
>
> Modified:
>django/trunk/tests/regressiontests/forms/models.py
> Log:
> Changed field to "def_date" from "date" in new tests fr
2007/10/22, Jeremy Dunck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> On 10/22/07, Antoni Aloy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I had the problems with page cache, now I'm using this snippet
> > although it caches all the site, but I prefered that solution in order
> > to avoid to mantain a patched version of Django.
On 10/22/07, Antoni Aloy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ...
> Please take a look at
> http://www.djangosnippets.org/snippets/443/
> Perhaps he had the same problem with order, but in any case having the
> language on any key cache will made that snippet obsolete.
I commented on that snippet to ask
2007/10/22, Jeremy Dunck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> On 10/22/07, Antoni Aloy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I've found that caches are not i18n friendly, that is the cache is the
> > same for any language. In Django snippets there is a middleware to
> > deal with this fact, and I have send a patch m
On 10/22/07, Antoni Aloy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've found that caches are not i18n friendly, that is the cache is the
> same for any language. In Django snippets there is a middleware to
> deal with this fact, and I have send a patch myself to the Django
> core.
Which cache are you talking
Hello!
I've found that caches are not i18n friendly, that is the cache is the
same for any language. In Django snippets there is a middleware to
deal with this fact, and I have send a patch myself to the Django
core.
The change is in fact minor, just add the current locale to the cache
key and i
On 10/19/07, jdietrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Can someone review the patch I've attached to ticket 3480 and verify
> that it is sane? I think that should close out both #3480 and #3549,
> and it seems a bit more kosher than the patch on #3549
It looks OK to me, rather along the lines of t
It would be nice to take advantage of differing priorities rather than
discourage them. I think that's the way it's meant to work, but in this
case the requestor doesn't have the expertise to finish the job?
Just my unrequested two cents,
Matt
-Original Message-
From: django-develo
On 10/21/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Selfishly I would like to be able to do:
> {% load firstapp.library as mylib %}
> {{ context_var|mylib.myfilter }}
I don't think this would play nicely with the existing {% load
library1 library2 %} syntax.
A.
--~--~-~--~
Previously discussed in:
http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers/browse_frm/thread/63046b2fca27673c
Further discussion in mod_wsgi list, albeit how it affected web.py in:
http://groups.google.com/group/webpy/browse_frm/thread/4b1e7a63b90ccb8
You would only be affected at this poi
Graham Dumpleton wrote:
> They have now committed changes in relation to this:
>
> http://www.initd.org/tracker/psycopg/changeset/902
>
> On visual inspection the changes look to do what I was suggesting.
>
hmm.. could you please summarize the situation?
in other words, what problems am i f
15 matches
Mail list logo
