Also Jacob, on the documentation the link ot the contenttypes docs have gone
missing. As well as a few other documentation files that don't seem to be on
the index link.
Is this intentional?
On 9/19/07, Todd O'Bryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, 2007-09-18 at 15:51 -0500, Jacob Kaplan-
On 9/19/07, Marty Alchin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I think I can make signals work well, if the signal provides a few
> arguments. I'm think that if it sent "sender" (the Relationship),
> "origin" and "related" (the two models), people should be able to
> register functions to do just about a
I second Todds suggestion.
I'm also just +0 on the whole affair. While it would be nice I think it has
far surpassed the effort needed.
On 9/19/07, Todd O'Bryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 2007-09-19 at 00:29 +, Johann C. Rocholl wrote:
> > On Sep 17, 10:17 am, "Justin Lilly" <[E
On Wed, 2007-09-19 at 00:29 +, Johann C. Rocholl wrote:
> On Sep 17, 10:17 am, "Justin Lilly" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I personally would also like a favicon for the django sites. I took the
> > liberty of creating one using django's colors and fonts (stole the d from
> > the logo).
> >
On Tue, 2007-09-18 at 15:51 -0500, Jacob Kaplan-Moss wrote:
> Hi folks --
>
> OK, I figured out what went wrong, but unfortunately in the process
> wiped away the ones uploaded in the last couple hours.
>
> Sigh.
>
> I'm gonna consider that "good enough" and stop fucking around until
> I've got
Someone may need to take a close look at the code for me, but my quick
glance says yes, see:
http://code.djangoproject.com/browser/django/trunk/django/db/models/query.py#L1120
Mike.
On 9/19/07, Rob Hudson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Hi Devs,
>
> Is model.objects.all().delete() optimized to
Hi Devs,
Is model.objects.all().delete() optimized to use DELETE FROM? I'm
only asking because I was trying to clear a table with about 20k
records and it took minutes rather than seconds. I'm using MySQL as
the backend. I'm not very familiar with the database query mechanism
and I know it's b
On Sep 17, 10:17 am, "Justin Lilly" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I personally would also like a favicon for the django sites. I took the
> liberty of creating one using django's colors and fonts (stole the d from
> the logo).
>
> http://www.flickr.com/photos/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/1397125183/
Here's
On 9/19/07, Leah Culver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I don't say much to this group, but I have a few questions about the
> auth module ...
>
> Will auth be updated to newforms anytime soon?
Yes, but the changes will probably land in the newforms-admin first.
I started fiddling with this recen
On 9/17/07, Marty Alchin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'll get a new patch together tonight, including a get_filename() that
> returns None if the backend doesn't implement it. That should clear
> away the last remaining worry I had about maintaining existing
> functionality. I'll hold off on tick
I think you're seeing the same problem I was when I submitted ticket
#5505 ( http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/5505 ). I guess the
problem isn't limited to self-referential foreignkeys though, like I
originally thought.
The patches db-models-fields-init.patch and newforms-forms.patch fix
the
On 9/18/07, Leah Culver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Will auth be updated to newforms anytime soon?
Everything *will* be updated to use newforms eventually, once someone
finds the time. If this is something you need it should be a pretty
quick job, and a patch we'd love to get!
> Any plans to re
I don't say much to this group, but I have a few questions about the
auth module ...
Will auth be updated to newforms anytime soon?
Any plans to rewrite the examples in
http://www.djangoproject.com/documentation/sessions/#examples?
The examples don't seem to deal with "backends" when the middle
Hi folks --
OK, I figured out what went wrong, but unfortunately in the process
wiped away the ones uploaded in the last couple hours.
Sigh.
I'm gonna consider that "good enough" and stop fucking around until
I've got proper backups running.
Sorry to anyone who needs to upload patches again.
Jacob, if you didn't like my patch to #231, you could've just said so,
you didn't have to delete patches from others to cover your trail.
:-)
Uploading now...
Jacob Kaplan-Moss wrote:
On 9/18/07, Honza Král <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I could reupload that one, but there are
On 9/18/07, Jacob Kaplan-Moss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 9/18/07, Honza Král <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I could reupload that one, but there are other patches missing (even
> > in that ticked) that I do not have... :(
>
> Yeah; I'm trying to find where they went -- did rsync just silent
On 9/18/07, Russell Keith-Magee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> First off - I acknowledge the underlying problem (making m2m
> intermediate models easier to use), and I would like to see a
> solution. However, while I'm sure your propsed solution could be made
> to work, I'm not sure it would be a go
On 9/18/07, Honza Král <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I could reupload that one, but there are other patches missing (even
> in that ticked) that I do not have... :(
Yeah; I'm trying to find where they went -- did rsync just silently
delete stuff!? -- but I can't guarantee I'll be successful... ver
I could reupload that one, but there are other patches missing (even
in that ticked) that I do not have... :(
for example
http://code.djangoproject.com/attachment/ticket/3218/form_wizard_with_tests_and_docs_r6199.diff
which contains the older patch along with tests and documentation...
On 9/18/0
On 9/18/07, Honza Král <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> not quite it would seem:
>
> http://code.djangoproject.com/attachment/ticket/3218/wizard.5.py
Damn - I'm not sure what the deal is... think you could just reupload that one?
Jacob
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You recei
not quite it would seem:
http://code.djangoproject.com/attachment/ticket/3218/wizard.5.py
On 9/18/07, Jacob Kaplan-Moss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 9/18/07, Jacob Kaplan-Moss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > D'oh -- forgot to rsync over the Trac attachments directory again.
> > I'll take care
On 9/18/07, Jacob Kaplan-Moss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> D'oh -- forgot to rsync over the Trac attachments directory again.
> I'll take care of it once I'm at work and behind the firewall. Expect
> to see those attachments back in about 40 minutes or so.
OK, fixed now.
Jacob
--~--~-~-
On 9/18/07, Michael Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is that not violating DRY in itself there? I mean we're gonna end up with
> alot of people writing the documentation with it, just as much as writing
> the FTP module itself. I think this is something where we're always going to
> have the "re
On 9/19/07, Marty Alchin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On 9/18/07, Johan Bergström <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Since FTP and SFTP are so closely related i still think that the 'why'
> > or 'how do i' would show more often than not if FTP was omitted. My
> > view of frameworks is generally bas
On 9/18/07, Ramiro Morales <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Seems to affect attachments posted to Trac starting Friday 14 and
> sometime between
> Monday 17 16PM to 22PM. Attachments posted outsied that time window
> don't seem to be affected.
D'oh -- forgot to rsync over the Trac attachments directo
On 9/18/07, onno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> When will this page be back online?
> http://www.djangoproject.com/documentation/models/
Oops - I seem to have broken it. I'll take a look at get it fixed.
Jacob
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because
On 9/18/07, Johan Bergström <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Since FTP and SFTP are so closely related i still think that the 'why'
> or 'how do i' would show more often than not if FTP was omitted. My
> view of frameworks is generally based on DRY - but i guess at some
> point it is wiser to pick 'be
On Sep 18, 1:21 pm, "Marty Alchin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 9/18/07, Johan Bergström <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > What is wrong with using FTP for intranet file shuffling? I don't
> > think frameworks should decide or advocate how you design your
> > application from a security point
On 9/18/07, SmileyChris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I guess it's part of the move, but we seem to have lost a lot of the
> attached files!
I'm seeing this too (for me, it was tickets #5506 and #5516). Any ideas Jacob?
I'm also seeing a huge increase in spam content in the tickets. Has
somethi
Ok Thank you andy
I did scour through old messages for a other reports of this problem
but did not find it earlier. Thank for the link.
regards,
suresh.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django deve
When will this page be back online?
http://www.djangoproject.com/documentation/models/
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-developer
It sounds related to this:
http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers/tree/browse_frm/thread/76e8b700b30b85ff/44359701d3b9be4c?rnum=1&_done=%2Fgroup%2Fdjango-developers%2Fbrowse_frm%2Fthread%2F76e8b700b30b85ff%3F#doc_5d6b304972a7cd5b
I think Joseph is looking into it. The current SVN versio
On 9/18/07, SmileyChris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I guess it's part of the move, but we seem to have lost a lot of the
> attached files!
>
> For example, the recent patch submission to #231,
> http://code.djangoproject.com/attachment/ticket/231/max_length_cleanups_with_docs.diff
>
Seems to a
Hello,
I seem to have a problem with the newforms-admin revision 6373. When I
have a recursive many2many it fails. The top of the call stack start
at self.base_fields.copy() . For the simple example below when I click
on the add keyword in the admin interface. I get the following stack.
I also g
On 9/18/07, Johan Bergström <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What is wrong with using FTP for intranet file shuffling? I don't
> think frameworks should decide or advocate how you design your
> application from a security point of view. Offering both SFTP/FTP with
> documented recommendations towards
On Sep 17, 6:13 pm, "Jacob Kaplan-Moss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On 9/17/07, jedie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > What's about a FTP backend? ;)
>
> I'd be -1 on including one with Django for the simple reason that FTP
> is dangerously insecure. Anyone still using FTP should be encouraged
On 18/09/2007, jedie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On 17 Sep., 18:13, "Jacob Kaplan-Moss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > Now, a SSH/SFTP backend... that would rock.
>
> Yes, SFTP would be better than normal FTP. IMHO it needs some external
> Libs to support this. FTP is in the standard python
I guess it's part of the move, but we seem to have lost a lot of the
attached files!
For example, the recent patch submission to #231,
http://code.djangoproject.com/attachment/ticket/231/max_length_cleanups_with_docs.diff
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this m
38 matches
Mail list logo
