On 5/19/07, Russell Keith-Magee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The Djinn says "It is Done. You have two more wishes."
"You think I *asked* for a 14-inch pianist?"
(Thanks!)
Jacob
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Goo
On 5/20/07, Russell Keith-Magee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Committed in [5296], along with a quick proof of concept test for the
> lorem ipsum template tag in contrib.webdesign.
>
> Caveats for new players - The contrib app needs to have a models.py in
> order for tests to be found, even if th
On 5/20/07, Jacob Kaplan-Moss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Agreed. This would also make moving third-party apps into contrib
> easier (we wouldn't have to move tests to a different place).
>
> Anyone interested in modifying runtests to discover and load
> django.contrib.*.tests?
The Djinn says
On 5/19/07, Malcolm Tredinnick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I had been thinking about this abit recently, too. I think the answer is
> yes, they should. Otherwise every single test ends up having to load and
> install every single contrib app (because the main test suite doesn't do
> any different
On Sat, 2007-05-19 at 00:16 -0500, Gary Wilson wrote:
> Should contrib app tests go in that particular contrib app's directory
> as opposed to the global tests directory?
I had been thinking about this abit recently, too. I think the answer is
yes, they should. Otherwise every single test ends up
